Hi Martin,
I noticed the jagged overlap edge between swaths in your screenshots and assumed that was because your data was maybe captured from an unstable platform, possibly a small helicopter or a remotely controlled unmanned aircraft…
But when I finally got around testing this on some of our data (captured from a fixed wing airplane, Leica sensor), I noticed the same jaggedness in the overlap definition. This is not what I was used to with our data, and also not what are clients are used to.
Would there be a setting I can use to avoid this from happening? I would rather have a neat edge between swaths if possible.
Or do you have some more information on how this edge is defined, so that I can maybe tweak the input data to make it work?
Some screenshots to clarify:
Input data
Overlap removed by Lastools
Overlap removed by another tool
Thanks,
Edgar
--
Download LAStools at
http://lastools.org/
Visit the LAStools group at
http://groups.google.com/group/lastools/
Be social with LAStools at
http://www.facebook.com/LAStools
http://www.twitter.com/LAStools
But when I finally got around testing this on some of our data (captured from a fixed wing airplane, Leica sensor), I noticed the same jaggedness in the overlap definition. This is not what I was used to with our data, and also not what are clients are used to.
Would there be a setting I can use to avoid this from happening? I would rather have a neat edge between swaths if possible. Or do you have some more information on how this edge is defined, so that I can maybe tweak the input data to make it work?
Hi Martin,
--
Download LAStools at
http://lastools.org
Be social with LAStools at