Hello,
a little follow-up to Charm's question from a few weeks ago. With LAStools you can easily create an intuitive visual illustration of the actual point density distribution in LiDAR flight lines (see attached example). First I counted the number of points per 25 square meters using lasgrid and output the result an BIL grid
lasgrid -i sample.laz ^
-last_only ^
-density_16bit -step 5 ^
-o density_25.bil
I then visualized the BIL grid with lasview (yes, lasview - like most other LAStools - has read support for BIL and ASC) and played with the scaling and the coloring to produce the visualization (see attached).
lasview -i density_25.bil -color_by_elevation2
It is obvious that for this zigzag scanner the area along the edges of the scan line have a much much higher density than average. The single red point the attached visualization represents a particular 5 by 5 cell that had 388 points falling into it meaning a point density of over 15 point per square meter (i.e. 388 / 25). Most of the 25 square meter cells are blue and have between 45 and 50 points per square meter. Interesting are the subtle blue wobbles in flight direction that are caused by the changes in the airplane's pitch which compresses and stretches the scan line spacing.
The attached histogram (cut off at 127) shows the distribution of point counts per 25 square meter cell for the entire strip. The high values on the right have to do with the high zigzag density at the edges. But the low values on the of the peak worry me a bit. I was thinking that those may all be from the edge of the flight line where the 25 square meter cells have little to almost no overlap with the strip, but the visualization of 25 square meter cells that contain just a single last return (see last image) shows that the cells are all over the place.
lasview -i density_25.bil -color_by_elevation2 -clip_z_above 1.1
Why? Water bodies? In any case, it seems that most cells receive around 48 points so I would say this flight strip delivers a pulse density of nearly 2 pulses per square meter.
Regards,
Martin @rapidlasso
--