Adhoc Members List

[Lahabitat Owners]

Hello Members

A meeting was held on Friday 23rd of March to discuss the future of how to run La Habitat in the same zeal and manner if not in a better way. Though the meeting was seen as a little premature since the members are still not aware of how the next phase begins, there was a consensus to select 16 members and discuss among them of what we should do next. 

These members are temporary and if any of you would like to be part of this, please do so. A meeting is scheduled next Friday 30th of March at 8.30 to review the progress. These members will apprise others about the permutations are combinations of what should be the best possible solution.

The Adhoc Members are

Mrs Philomena Kamat

Ms Kiran Pandey

Mrs Saraswathy Ramanujam

Mrs Rejal Sheth

C K Yagnik

Milan Joshi

Premjibhai Thakker

Vinod Vaishnavi

Rakesh Bhattacharjee

Ajit Verma

Bhagyesh Patel

Dr Hitesh Patel

Sumit Dheer

Mrs Chakshu Shah

Sumit Sethi

Vinaykumar Singhal

--
Lahabitat Advocacy and Action Committee (LAAC)
Locate us at Google Earth on 23° 3'37.10"N, 72°30'36.69"E

Mail us directly: lah...@gmail.com

Get all the pictures and status: www.facebook.com/lahabitat

Get the most updated status of La habitat: http://lahabitat.blogspot.com

Get all the Tweets : www.twitter.com/lahabit
Google Groups which you are already a member : http://groups.google.co.in/group/lahabit
Use this id to mail to entire group : lah...@googlegroups.com

Address: Central Lawns, La Habitat, Thaltej, Ahmedabad

Disclaimer: LAAC is not registered under any entity but propose to raise goodwill from the Human Market. Views expressed here are general opinion open for discussion and debate and not for any personal character assassination. This is a body made by and for the members of La Habitat and is not meant to be distributed outside the campus. Use of LAAC Service is at any persons, including a member’s, own risk. The data and information provided on the Group Mail are advice & suggestions to improve community living, professional or otherwise, and should be relied upon as such. Neither the information, nor any opinion contained in this mail constitutes a solicitation or offer by LAAC to implement or execute any work or duty. This disclaimer shall be applicable to any person visiting/accessing the mail/blog/Facebook and/or a member entering into an agreement related to availing of the Group mail offered by LAAC. The display, description or references to any suggestions, services, publications or links on the URL/Facebook shall not constitute an endorsement by LAAC of such suggestion, services, publications or links. The services of LAAC are purely voluntary and its suggestions are recommendatory in nature. Adhering to these will keep the members in good health and smiling for ever.

[rupesh shah]

Dear Members,

 

All of you must have seen the circular received from Pacifica.  There are some issues which need internal discussion between members. A meeting is desirable.

 

Basically, irrespective of the decision taken by the majority, one thing I feel is that the administrative control should first be given to the society members and the society members should in turn issue a contract / Work Order for carrying out maintenance work.  Pacifica or its subsidiary is not going to maintain La Habitat eternally, so some day we will have to take administrative control and then sub contract it to a professional agency.  

 

Further, from the details of expenses received, it is seen that Pacifica has not put profit element in the costing for the past years, nor have they proposed for the ensuing year.  This means that maintenance is “at cost basis”. 

 

I donot know the implications of “service” cooperative society that LaHabitat has been registered as, however, members should share their knowledge on this for understanding of all.

 

In case anybody has had discussions with Pacifica on this subject it would be appropriate to bring it to the attention of all members.  

 

Regards,

Rupesh

 

 

---

---

The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only.
It shall not attach any liability on the originator or GSPCGROUP or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in
this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of GSPCGROUP or its affiliates.
Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of
this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any mail and
attachments please check them for viruses and defect.

[j k baid]

Regarding Administrative control issue, I am fully agreed  with Mr. Rupesh.

Regarding  maintenance " at cost basis " I slightly differ .

 Before   arriving at  any decision ,we should  see the details of some expenditure ,as shown in the statements sent to us .

There are also some Income elements ,which I think  have not been considered or to be checked in detail.

So  only after discussing all these issues between members,  we should take any decision.



J.K.Baid

From:	rupesh shah <rup...@gspc.in>
To:	"lah...@googlegroups.com" <lah...@googlegroups.com>
Date:	04/19/2012 03:00 PM
Subject:	[LaHabitat]: LaHabitat : Maintenance

---

[Sarthak Sureka]

Hi,

I totally disagree on the points given by Mr. Rupesh.

How can you say "Irrespective of majority decision" control should come to members. No one has right deny or oppose majority members decision.

Fine Pacifica is not going to maintain it eternally but till the time Pacifica is interested we should not take control of maintenance because Pacifica is it self a Highly Professional group & I don't think there was any such vast lacunae in providing services.

Everyone has issues regarding maintenance but giving it to any outside party won't give solution every member.

Suggestion to give control to any Professional service provider should be taken after considering that Pacifica provides on "cost basis" & any other person would be charging "profit element".

Whomsoever is going to maintain is going to be criticized so we shouldn't feel outside party would be a saviour.

Thanks
Sarthak
Sent on my BlackBerry® 26FE19CB from Vodafone

[rupesh shah]

I reiterate I continue to have the right to oppose majority decision, if I feel justified, and no blanket statements denying me any right are acceptable.

 

Rupesh

[Sarthak Sureka]

That is what I m saying there is need of justifying decision rather taking control irrespectively.

As you said you will oppose if you feel justified in the same way I wanted to say that if some members feel we shouldn't take control of society & keep it with any xyz agency, we can't take "irrespective decision to take society in our hands" ignoring those members point of view.

No blanket statement, really sorry for that.

Thanks
Sarthak

Sent on my BlackBerry® 26FE19CB from Vodafone

---

From: rupesh shah <rup...@gspc.in>

Sender: lah...@googlegroups.com

Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:54:43 +0530

To: lah...@googlegroups.com<lah...@googlegroups.com>

ReplyTo: lah...@googlegroups.com

Subject: RE: [LaHabitat]: LaHabitat : Maintenance