Dear Colleagues,
Kindly indicate if you are interested in being nominated as a volunteer member of the Jury for the Stockholm Junior Water Prize(SJWP) Nigeria Competition.
If interested, kindly make your comments and opinion on the two attached projects indicating which of the two is the best.
We will appreciate receiving your comments and opinions as soon as possible preferably by COB today or ;latest 12noon tomorrow.
Apologies for the urgency as I am aware that you are all very busy people.
Find sample comments below for your guidance :
I have now studied the
two proposals:
1. Pure Water for Life, by Sarturaki,
Oshadami, Adekola
2. Glisten air assisted reactor for water
treatment, by Bello, Adewumi, Matane
Brief comments:
1. The study is focused and convincing: It
states the problem, and proposes a solution (purification using two
techniques). The solution is tested and the results are presented in terms of
reduction of “pollution”. The results are clearly presented based upon a lab
water test before and after treatment. Furthermore, it seems to be rather easy
to replicate the purification process using readily available materials.
2. The study goes to deeper depth on the
issue of water and contamination of water. But in doing that, it also loses
focus and is broader than it would need, considering the “statement of
purpose”. Furthermore, the result is contained in a single sentence: “this
project showed that the proposed materials could efficiently remove heavy
metals like Cu…”. It’s a statement without any supporting evidence, such as for
example a laboratory test of the water sample before and after.
In our view, the study
“Pure Water for Life”, by Sarturaki, Oshadami, Adekola, numbered 1 above, is
the best proposal of the two proposals.
Regards,
Anthony Akpan
President
Pan African Vision for the Environment (PAVE)
2nd Floor, Rear Flat,
59, Palm Avenue, Mushin
P.O.BOX 494 , Ijanikin, Lagos, Nigeria
Tel: 07068329371, 08035423750