Can anybody buy these things? If so, what to do to get one?
(Please forgive my ignorance, probably most of the LCLUG members
already know the ropes...)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "La Crosse Linux Users Group" on Google.
To visit our web site, go to http://www.lclug.org
To post to this group, send email to lacro...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lacrosselug...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lacrosselug?hl=en
thanks,
Pete
thanks,
Pete
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "La Crosse
> Linux Users Group" on Google.
>
> To visit our web site, go to http://www.lclug.org
I don't recommend HP printers! The reason why is that they put the print head on
the ink cartridge and the cost of ink is then astronomical. Canon and Epson
both have a real print head and the ink cartridges are just that, ink.
Repair parts are available for the epsons, though not as many parts for the
consumer models. I have a wide carriage Epson R1800. It uses archival inks, but
has one of the lowest ink prices out there. Heather and I have won a couple of
blue ribbons at the county fair with pictures from it. Epson has been great
about both supporting open source driver development and also provides binary
blobs for most of their printers. I set up an all in one epson for Mr. Hanson
that is running off of the wireless AP on the windmill. He can print, scan, and
fax from anywhere on the farm, and move the printer to anywhere on the farm.
Cannon does not support the open source community like epson does, but they are
well engineered printers.
If you are just going to be printing pictures, go to wallgreens or someplace
similar. Even with the very low cost for consumables on my pro level epson, I
don't break even, by comparison, until I get to an 8x10 or larger print. For
smaller stuff it is cheaper to have someone else print it unless you need
close color control. Pigment based inks are the best for photos. Dye based inks
are great for documents.
When it comes to printers you get what you pay for. They give away the cheap
printers to make money off of you buying ink, and new print heads constantly.
They also make them as cheap as possible to reduce their losses should you not
buy ink. I would say that $200 is the starting point for a 'REAL' printer.
Maybe a bit higher for an all in one.
For b&w, you can not beat the brother led printers, though the samsungs are
close.
My above opinions are based not only on opensource aspects, but I also repaired
printers, copiers, etc. for a couple of years. With the exception of the $700+
lasers, HPs are throw away, money makers, sold on their name. Lexmark doesn't
even support opensource for their high end business models and copiers. I
once talked with one of their engineers and he said they are one of the
most proprietary companies in the business. Cannons are well built with parts
available but opensource drivers are hit and miss.
Run like hell from the heat transfer printers (melted wax). We have an
extremely expensive Xerox one at WDRT and it is the biggest POS yet. There is
also short life spans on the consumer level heat transfers, and color rendition
is always off.
Color laser printers are over priced with high cost of ownership, poor color
reproduction, and resolutions are quite low by comparison. Not anywhere near
photo quality.
My $5 worth,
Dragon
The caveat about Epsons is that you have to use them at least a couple
of times a week or the printhead plugs up and it takes several cleaning
cycles to clear. They do a good job.
>
> If you are just going to be printing pictures, go to wallgreens or someplace
> similar. Even with the very low cost for consumables on my pro level epson, I
> don't break even, by comparison, until I get to an 8x10 or larger print. For
> smaller stuff it is cheaper to have someone else print it unless you need
> close color control. Pigment based inks are the best for photos. Dye based inks
> are great for documents.
Right on.
> For b&w, you can not beat the brother led printers, though the samsungs are
> close.
Laser/LED printers are the way to go for B/W.
> Color laser printers are over priced with high cost of ownership, poor color
> reproduction, and resolutions are quite low by comparison. Not anywhere near
> photo quality.
>
I've got a color laser, it's nice but pricey as described. If you can
use a b/w designation for the driver so it does not use the color
cartridges unless you want to print color. Call it VGA or a little
better for resolution and rendition.
Ed.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "La Crosse Linux Users Group" on Google.
To visit our web site, go to http://www.lclug.org
To post to this group, send email to lacro...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lacrosselug-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com