Re: model slow down, is this known? Is it a bug?

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Jen Goree

unread,
Dec 4, 2014, 11:52:45 AM12/4/14
to Nathan Kimball, lab-m...@googlegroups.com
Nathan - sorry for not responding to this sooner, I've just gone in and taken a look. I don't know why it is slowing down, so I'm cc'ing lab-models.

Does anyone else know? I've attached a screenshot so that you can see the graphs; the issue is that the vibration of the atoms slows down after a minute or so, like they're getting tired. 

Interestingly, I could reproduce it on Chrome and Firefox but not on Safari.


On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Nathan Kimball <nkim...@concord.org> wrote:
Hi Jen,

Wondering if you have seen this.  In this model,


the left hand blob of molecules slows down, even in vacuum over the course of about 2 minutes.

This is not a case of transfer of energy.  The graph shows constant energy...something about the way the model visualizes the motion.

-Nathan

Screen Shot 2014-12-04 at 11.42.51 AM.png

Sam Fentress

unread,
Dec 4, 2014, 12:29:48 PM12/4/14
to lab-models, Nathan Kimball
It looks to me that the graph is taking up processing-speed or memory.

If you remove the graph, the slow down does not appear. I ran two models side-by-side, with and without the graph, and the slow down was apparent only in the version with the graph.

Sam

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lab-models" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lab-models+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Jen Goree

unread,
Dec 5, 2014, 10:19:50 AM12/5/14
to lab-m...@googlegroups.com, Nathan Kimball
So this is a graph bug we should track?


Jen Goree
jgo...@concord.org
Software Portfolio and Project Manager
The Concord Consortium

Scott Cytacki

unread,
Dec 5, 2014, 10:54:46 AM12/5/14
to lab-models, Nathan Kimball
We knew about this issue before. But I don't know if we have a bug for it.
It might be appropriate to put this bug here:

Especially since I think the netlogo group is using it, and it would probably be helpful for them to see that issue is known.
Scott Cytacki
The Concord Consortium

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages