Dear Mr Mittal,
It is sad that ‘to grab power’ you are twisting facts and yet again misleading the general members, in a bid to retain your post as General Secretary, which you had publicly denounced in the General Body meeting held at Geeta Bhawan on 29th Nov. The lust for power forces you to try anything however false it might be. Let us examine the two legal cases in the right perspective.
HIGH COURT CASE
Here we are fighting for our right to ownership in the whole project. The law says that if, the allottee has paid 100% of his consideration money, he becomes the part owner in the Project. The allottees have paid almost 90/95% of the money till now, as that is what has been demanded by PDL. Our contention in the Court is that, the balance amount left is only 5% to be paid at the time of possession. PDL will never ever ask for balance and hence we will never get a chance to pay that 5% amount which we are willing to pay. We are praying to the Court to consider our 95% as full consideration and grant us right to ownership in Project. THIS IS THE ONLY POINT THAT HON'BLE HIGH COURT has to decide in our favour.
Hon'ble High Court does not have to decide on possession, irregularities, illegalities, or even compensation to us. Therefore, the story of drawings etc etc that Mr Mittal has now invented to save his face against his wrong doings is completely wrong here. Members who were present in High Court in one of the hearings last March, wherein Mr Sanjiv Jain of PDL was summoned will recall that, their lawyer Mr Sandeep Sethi, had argued that possession was not the issue before the HIGH COURT, and Hon'ble Judge, Justice Mr Jayant Nath, agreed with him, as well as exempted Mr Sanjiv Jain from appearance in the Court, WITHOUT asking any question from him.
HENCE, THIS NEW STORY OF SOME MAPS AND ITS EFFECT ON HIGH COURT IS NOT TAINABLE FROM ANY ANGLE. I would also like to add here, that while Mr Mittal is right that Court grants dates that are not in anybody's hands, BUT HOW MANY TIMES WE SEE THE PLAINTIFF OF COMPLAINANT ASKING FOR DATES .In the current case, Mr Mittal asked for an adjournment on 18th November to file fresh documents, midway when Mr Lahoty was arguing the case. Had he NOT asked for adjournment, probably the arguments would have been concluded and some order would have come. The Hon'ble High Court gave FOUR week time to LRTA to file documents with advance copy to PDL and fixed the date for 18th January 2016.
Mr Mittal did nothing in the four weeks given to LTRA, and till the 18th Jan 2016, did not give any documents to our Lawyer. Hence, our lawyer had to seek adjournment, and the Court fixed the date for 8th Aug 2016.
In the joint meeting of old MC, new Monitoring Committee and Finance Committee on 23 Jan 2016, when confronted, Mr Mittal, rudely replied that all documents belong to him and he will give only after he gets Consultancy Charges. Further, he mentioned that all documents are already in EOW file. Now what does that mean:
THERE ARE NO FRESH DOCUMENTS WITH HIM. EOW CASE WAS PREPARED LAST YEAT MARCH BY MYSELF, ASEEM AND PANKAJ. MR MITTAL IS CLEARLY MISLEADING EVERYBODY, the members, our lawyers and even the Hon'ble High Court for his personal gains. HE HAS GIVEN A SEVEN MONTH TIME TO PDL TO GET EXTRA FAR THAT THEY ARE SEEKING.
I along with Mohit did offer to make a presentation for Mr Lahoty on the basis of all explosive data Mr Mittal claimed to have. BUT I AM STILL WAITING. NO DATA CAME MY WAY AND NONE WILL, AS THERE IS NONE WITH MR MITTAL.
NCDRC CASE
Till last year January, we were taking dates in NCDRC court as well. It is well documented and members can see this posted on the internet as well. When we, i.e. Me, Aseem and Pankaj started follow up, the case started moving. Mr Modi always claimed credit for early dates granted announcing that LRTA was getting early dates as Justice D.K. Jain was his PERSONAL FRIEND, and Mr Modi wanted to be acknowledged for that. He claimed this was his contribution to LTRA, as he did nothing substantial, he cooked up this story.
Mr Lahoty proudly claimed that LTRA was the first case against any builder where interim benefit was being granted. Now, that the date will come in regular course, where is the so called FRIENDSHIP disappeared. The date in DUE COURSE is a regular practice in NCDRC. MR MITTAL, let me remind you, we have not, I repeat NOT asked for adjournment unlike in HIGH COURT, where you did.
So, don't mix the two to confuse matters.
Also let me inform all the members, it was US who always raised the issue of including the additional 100 members who have paid their legal contribution but are still not part of our legal cases. Time and again we have discussed the matter with Mr Lahoty and time and again it has been stalled by Mr Mittal and Mr Modi for reasons best known to them. Even the Monitoring committee finalized the fee with Mr Lahoty for the additional members, which was gladly accepted and appreciated by members of team Samarpit but was denied by Mr Mittal and Mr Modi, again for reasons best known to them.
EOW
The criminality of PDL is being dealt here, which is the right forum. EOW has hired an independent architect, as told to us by the dealing SHO, and detailed working is under process, which will be used to nail PDL, here. The entire case at EOW was possible due to personal contacts used by Dr Shandilya with Commissioner of Police and Hon'ble Lt. Governor. The architect appointed by EOW is the result of his personal contacts used, and is FREE OF COST, and NOT like Mr Mittal who wanted money even to president our complaint to DCP EOW.
Mr Mittal is now also collecting money Rs 25,000 from some members to build up a corpus for god knows what.
In the past also Mr Mittal paid Rs. 5,00,000.00 to Mr Vabhav Gaggar which still has not been utilised. At one point he even referred his cousin’s company to manage the operations of LTRA at a fee of Rs. 35000.00/month that too from his own office (to handle paper work and communication with the members). He even wanted his close friend to handle any additional court cased rather than Mr Lahoty. It is quite clear that Mr Mittal is just finding ways to ensure that LTRA keeps spending money one way or the other, and his close friends get benefit from it, no matter whether it benefits LTRA or not.
I have put all the facts correctly and nothing has been hidden or overstated. Knowing the nature and lust for power of Mr Mittal and Mr Modi, I have refrained from fighting elections of LTRA. But shall offer my services to the best of my ability, without any post or position. But, my sincere request is to evaluate both the groups and vote for one group en block, which you feel can best protect your money and ensure early possession, without seeking any personal gain. May god bless LTRA and all its members.
Sincerely yours,
Sunil Sethi