Mathematical fact about representing numbers (Jonathan)
1 view
Skip to first unread message
James Crook
unread,
Jun 18, 2011, 11:54:23 AM6/18/11
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to L2learning
Jonathan wrote:
here's another fact that's interesting, and much simpler:
.999999...=1
Proof:
Let x=.999...
10x=9.999...
10x-x=9.999...-.999...
9x=9
x=1
So, .999...=1!
That's pretty cool, I think.
Yes. One way to look at it is that '...' (or rather the notation with
dots above the start and end of the repeating part) is an operator
that operates on a number. Then it's no longer that different from
being able to represent the same number either as 0.5 or 1/2. Without
the '...' notation each decimal number can only be represented one way
as a decimal number (let's outlaw minus zero ). That's a nice
property to have. Unfortunately you can't represent 1/3 without using
an operator nor can you represent a lot of other rational numbers.
But is that so very bad? You can't represent sqrt(2) without using an
operator either.