[PATCH 1/3] kunit: tool: make TestCounts a dataclass

[Daniel Latypov]

Since we're using Python 3.7+, we can use dataclasses to tersen the
code.

It also lets us create pre-populated TestCounts() objects and compare
them in our unit test. (Before, you could only create empty ones).

Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlat...@google.com>
---
tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py | 25 ++++++++-----------------
tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 4 +---
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
index 1ae873e3e341..f022966858f2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
# Author: Rae Moar <rm...@google.com>

from __future__ import annotations
+from dataclasses import dataclass
import re
import sys

@@ -67,27 +68,17 @@ class TestStatus(Enum):
NO_TESTS = auto()
FAILURE_TO_PARSE_TESTS = auto()

+@dataclass
class TestCounts:
"""
Tracks the counts of statuses of all test cases and any errors within
a Test.
-
- Attributes:
- passed : int - the number of tests that have passed
- failed : int - the number of tests that have failed
- crashed : int - the number of tests that have crashed
- skipped : int - the number of tests that have skipped
- errors : int - the number of errors in the test and subtests
- """
- def __init__(self):
- """Creates TestCounts object with counts of all test
- statuses and test errors set to 0.
- """
- self.passed = 0
- self.failed = 0
- self.crashed = 0
- self.skipped = 0
- self.errors = 0
+ """
+ passed: int = 0
+ failed: int = 0
+ crashed: int = 0
+ skipped: int = 0
+ errors: int = 0

def __str__(self) -> str:
"""Returns the string representation of a TestCounts object."""
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
index e2cd2cc2e98f..9fa4babb2506 100755
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
@@ -179,9 +179,7 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase):
kunit_parser.extract_tap_lines(
file.readlines()))
# A missing test plan is not an error.
- self.assertEqual(0, result.counts.errors)
- # All tests should be accounted for.
- self.assertEqual(10, result.counts.total())
+ self.assertEqual(result.counts, kunit_parser.TestCounts(passed=10, errors=0))
self.assertEqual(
kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS,
result.status)

base-commit: 5aaef24b5c6d4246b2cac1be949869fa36577737
--
2.38.1.273.g43a17bfeac-goog

[Daniel Latypov]

Let's verify that the parser isn't reporting any errors for valid
inputs.

This change also
* does result.status checking on one line
* makes sure we consistently do it outside of the `with` block

Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlat...@google.com>
---

tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 93 +++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
index 9fa4babb2506..0063773c0fc4 100755
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
@@ -133,33 +133,29 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase):
all_passed_log = test_data_path('test_is_test_passed-all_passed.log')
with open(all_passed_log) as file:
result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(file.readlines())
- self.assertEqual(
- kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS,
- result.status)
+ self.assertEqual(kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS, result.status)
+ self.assertEqual(result.counts.errors, 0)

def test_parse_successful_nested_tests_log(self):
all_passed_log = test_data_path('test_is_test_passed-all_passed_nested.log')
with open(all_passed_log) as file:
result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(file.readlines())
- self.assertEqual(
- kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS,
- result.status)
+ self.assertEqual(kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS, result.status)
+ self.assertEqual(result.counts.errors, 0)

def test_kselftest_nested(self):
kselftest_log = test_data_path('test_is_test_passed-kselftest.log')
with open(kselftest_log) as file:
result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(file.readlines())
- self.assertEqual(
- kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS,
- result.status)
+ self.assertEqual(kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS, result.status)
+ self.assertEqual(result.counts.errors, 0)

def test_parse_failed_test_log(self):
failed_log = test_data_path('test_is_test_passed-failure.log')
with open(failed_log) as file:
result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(file.readlines())
- self.assertEqual(
- kunit_parser.TestStatus.FAILURE,
- result.status)
+ self.assertEqual(kunit_parser.TestStatus.FAILURE, result.status)
+ self.assertEqual(result.counts.errors, 0)

def test_no_header(self):
empty_log = test_data_path('test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run_no_header.log')
@@ -167,9 +163,8 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase):
result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(
kunit_parser.extract_tap_lines(file.readlines()))
self.assertEqual(0, len(result.subtests))
- self.assertEqual(
- kunit_parser.TestStatus.FAILURE_TO_PARSE_TESTS,
- result.status)
+ self.assertEqual(kunit_parser.TestStatus.FAILURE_TO_PARSE_TESTS, result.status)
+ self.assertEqual(result.counts.errors, 1)

def test_missing_test_plan(self):
missing_plan_log = test_data_path('test_is_test_passed-'
@@ -180,9 +175,7 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase):

file.readlines()))
# A missing test plan is not an error.

self.assertEqual(result.counts, kunit_parser.TestCounts(passed=10, errors=0))
- self.assertEqual(
- kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS,
- result.status)
+ self.assertEqual(kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS, result.status)

def test_no_tests(self):
header_log = test_data_path('test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run_with_header.log')
@@ -190,9 +183,8 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase):
result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(
kunit_parser.extract_tap_lines(file.readlines()))
self.assertEqual(0, len(result.subtests))
- self.assertEqual(
- kunit_parser.TestStatus.NO_TESTS,
- result.status)
+ self.assertEqual(kunit_parser.TestStatus.NO_TESTS, result.status)
+ self.assertEqual(result.counts.errors, 1)

def test_no_tests_no_plan(self):
no_plan_log = test_data_path('test_is_test_passed-no_tests_no_plan.log')
@@ -203,7 +195,7 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase):
self.assertEqual(
kunit_parser.TestStatus.NO_TESTS,
result.subtests[0].subtests[0].status)
- self.assertEqual(1, result.counts.errors)
+ self.assertEqual(result.counts, kunit_parser.TestCounts(passed=1, errors=1))


def test_no_kunit_output(self):
@@ -215,6 +207,7 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase):
print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('could not find any KTAP output!'))
print_mock.stop()
self.assertEqual(0, len(result.subtests))
+ self.assertEqual(result.counts.errors, 1)

def test_skipped_test(self):
skipped_log = test_data_path('test_skip_tests.log')
@@ -222,18 +215,16 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase):
result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(file.readlines())

# A skipped test does not fail the whole suite.
- self.assertEqual(
- kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS,
- result.status)
+ self.assertEqual(kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS, result.status)
+ self.assertEqual(result.counts, kunit_parser.TestCounts(passed=4, skipped=1))

def test_skipped_all_tests(self):
skipped_log = test_data_path('test_skip_all_tests.log')
with open(skipped_log) as file:
result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(file.readlines())

- self.assertEqual(
- kunit_parser.TestStatus.SKIPPED,
- result.status)
+ self.assertEqual(kunit_parser.TestStatus.SKIPPED, result.status)
+ self.assertEqual(result.counts, kunit_parser.TestCounts(skipped=5))

def test_ignores_hyphen(self):
hyphen_log = test_data_path('test_strip_hyphen.log')
@@ -241,9 +232,7 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase):
result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(file.readlines())

# A skipped test does not fail the whole suite.
- self.assertEqual(
- kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS,
- result.status)
+ self.assertEqual(kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS, result.status)
self.assertEqual(
"sysctl_test",
result.subtests[0].name)
@@ -257,55 +246,49 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase):
prefix_log = test_data_path('test_config_printk_time.log')
with open(prefix_log) as file:
result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(file.readlines())
- self.assertEqual(
- kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS,
- result.status)
- self.assertEqual('kunit-resource-test', result.subtests[0].name)
+ self.assertEqual(kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS, result.status)
+ self.assertEqual('kunit-resource-test', result.subtests[0].name)
+ self.assertEqual(result.counts.errors, 0)

def test_ignores_multiple_prefixes(self):
prefix_log = test_data_path('test_multiple_prefixes.log')
with open(prefix_log) as file:
result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(file.readlines())
- self.assertEqual(
- kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS,
- result.status)
- self.assertEqual('kunit-resource-test', result.subtests[0].name)
+ self.assertEqual(kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS, result.status)
+ self.assertEqual('kunit-resource-test', result.subtests[0].name)
+ self.assertEqual(result.counts.errors, 0)

def test_prefix_mixed_kernel_output(self):
mixed_prefix_log = test_data_path('test_interrupted_tap_output.log')
with open(mixed_prefix_log) as file:
result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(file.readlines())
- self.assertEqual(
- kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS,
- result.status)
- self.assertEqual('kunit-resource-test', result.subtests[0].name)
+ self.assertEqual(kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS, result.status)
+ self.assertEqual('kunit-resource-test', result.subtests[0].name)
+ self.assertEqual(result.counts.errors, 0)

def test_prefix_poundsign(self):
pound_log = test_data_path('test_pound_sign.log')
with open(pound_log) as file:
result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(file.readlines())
- self.assertEqual(
- kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS,
- result.status)
- self.assertEqual('kunit-resource-test', result.subtests[0].name)
+ self.assertEqual(kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS, result.status)
+ self.assertEqual('kunit-resource-test', result.subtests[0].name)
+ self.assertEqual(result.counts.errors, 0)

def test_kernel_panic_end(self):
panic_log = test_data_path('test_kernel_panic_interrupt.log')
with open(panic_log) as file:
result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(file.readlines())
- self.assertEqual(
- kunit_parser.TestStatus.TEST_CRASHED,
- result.status)
- self.assertEqual('kunit-resource-test', result.subtests[0].name)
+ self.assertEqual(kunit_parser.TestStatus.TEST_CRASHED, result.status)
+ self.assertEqual('kunit-resource-test', result.subtests[0].name)
+ self.assertGreaterEqual(result.counts.errors, 1)

def test_pound_no_prefix(self):
pound_log = test_data_path('test_pound_no_prefix.log')
with open(pound_log) as file:
result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(file.readlines())
- self.assertEqual(
- kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS,
- result.status)
- self.assertEqual('kunit-resource-test', result.subtests[0].name)
+ self.assertEqual(kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS, result.status)
+ self.assertEqual('kunit-resource-test', result.subtests[0].name)
+ self.assertEqual(result.counts.errors, 0)

def line_stream_from_strs(strs: Iterable[str]) -> kunit_parser.LineStream:
return kunit_parser.LineStream(enumerate(strs, start=1))
--
2.38.1.273.g43a17bfeac-goog

[Daniel Latypov]

We're using a `with` block above, so the file object is already closed.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlat...@google.com>
---

tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
index 0063773c0fc4..c41567eaf3c3 100755
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
@@ -239,8 +239,6 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase):
self.assertEqual(
"example",
result.subtests[1].name)
- file.close()
-

def test_ignores_prefix_printk_time(self):

prefix_log = test_data_path('test_config_printk_time.log')

--
2.38.1.273.g43a17bfeac-goog

[David Gow]

On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 12:40 AM Daniel Latypov <dlat...@google.com> wrote:
>
> Since we're using Python 3.7+, we can use dataclasses to tersen the
> code.
>
> It also lets us create pre-populated TestCounts() objects and compare
> them in our unit test. (Before, you could only create empty ones).
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlat...@google.com>
> ---

Looks good, thanks.

Reviewed-by: David Gow <davi...@google.com>

Cheers,
-- David

[David Gow]

On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 12:40 AM 'Daniel Latypov' via KUnit Development
<kuni...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
> Let's verify that the parser isn't reporting any errors for valid
> inputs.
>
> This change also
> * does result.status checking on one line
> * makes sure we consistently do it outside of the `with` block
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlat...@google.com>
> ---

Looks good, thanks.

Note that this patch does conflict with "kunit: tool: print summary of
failed tests if a few failed out of a lot":
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/commit/?h=kunit&id=f19dd011d8de6f0c1d20abea5158aa4f5d9cea44
It's only a context line issue, though.

Reviewed-by: David Gow <davi...@google.com>

Cheers,
-- David

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "KUnit Development" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kunit-dev+...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kunit-dev/20221102164005.2516646-2-dlatypov%40google.com.

[David Gow]

On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 12:40 AM Daniel Latypov <dlat...@google.com> wrote:
>
> We're using a `with` block above, so the file object is already closed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlat...@google.com>
> ---

Nice catch.

Reviewed-by: David Gow <davi...@google.com>

Cheers,
-- David

[Daniel Latypov]

On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 11:38 PM David Gow <davi...@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 12:40 AM 'Daniel Latypov' via KUnit Development
> <kuni...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> >
> > Let's verify that the parser isn't reporting any errors for valid
> > inputs.
> >
> > This change also
> > * does result.status checking on one line
> > * makes sure we consistently do it outside of the `with` block
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlat...@google.com>
> > ---
>
> Looks good, thanks.
>
> Note that this patch does conflict with "kunit: tool: print summary of
> failed tests if a few failed out of a lot":
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/commit/?h=kunit&id=f19dd011d8de6f0c1d20abea5158aa4f5d9cea44
> It's only a context line issue, though.
>
> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davi...@google.com>

Oh huh, I rebased onto the kunit branch and it managed to merge cleanly.
I guess `git am` is more picky than `git rebase`.

I'll send a v2 that's rebased to avoid issues applying them.

[Daniel Latypov]

Since we're using Python 3.7+, we can use dataclasses to tersen the
code.

It also lets us create pre-populated TestCounts() objects and compare
them in our unit test. (Before, you could only create empty ones).

Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlat...@google.com>

Reviewed-by: David Gow <davi...@google.com>
---
v1 -> v2: just rebased onto linux-kselftest/kunit
---

tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py | 25 ++++++++-----------------
tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 4 +---
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py

index 94dba66feec5..a56c75a973b5 100644

--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
# Author: Rae Moar <rm...@google.com>

from __future__ import annotations
+from dataclasses import dataclass
import re
import sys

@@ -71,27 +72,17 @@ class TestStatus(Enum):

diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
index 7dcd67003b23..440a273f1d21 100755
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
@@ -182,9 +182,7 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase):
kunit_parser.extract_tap_lines(

file.readlines()))
# A missing test plan is not an error.

- self.assertEqual(0, result.counts.errors)
- # All tests should be accounted for.
- self.assertEqual(10, result.counts.total())
+ self.assertEqual(result.counts, kunit_parser.TestCounts(passed=10, errors=0))
self.assertEqual(
kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS,
result.status)

base-commit: 29ad37f740d302d0f27374edaf85fe8978e45ba9
--
2.38.1.431.g37b22c650d-goog

[Daniel Latypov]

Let's verify that the parser isn't reporting any errors for valid
inputs.

This change also
* does result.status checking on one line
* makes sure we consistently do it outside of the `with` block

Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlat...@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davi...@google.com>
---
v1 -> v2: just rebased onto linux-kselftest/kunit
---

tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 93 +++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
index 440a273f1d21..5e3429a1202b 100755
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
@@ -136,33 +136,29 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase):

@@ -170,9 +166,8 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase):

result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(
kunit_parser.extract_tap_lines(file.readlines()))
self.assertEqual(0, len(result.subtests))
- self.assertEqual(
- kunit_parser.TestStatus.FAILURE_TO_PARSE_TESTS,
- result.status)
+ self.assertEqual(kunit_parser.TestStatus.FAILURE_TO_PARSE_TESTS, result.status)
+ self.assertEqual(result.counts.errors, 1)

def test_missing_test_plan(self):
missing_plan_log = test_data_path('test_is_test_passed-'

@@ -183,9 +178,7 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase):

file.readlines()))
# A missing test plan is not an error.

self.assertEqual(result.counts, kunit_parser.TestCounts(passed=10, errors=0))
- self.assertEqual(
- kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS,
- result.status)
+ self.assertEqual(kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS, result.status)

def test_no_tests(self):
header_log = test_data_path('test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run_with_header.log')

@@ -193,9 +186,8 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase):

result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(
kunit_parser.extract_tap_lines(file.readlines()))
self.assertEqual(0, len(result.subtests))
- self.assertEqual(
- kunit_parser.TestStatus.NO_TESTS,
- result.status)
+ self.assertEqual(kunit_parser.TestStatus.NO_TESTS, result.status)
+ self.assertEqual(result.counts.errors, 1)

def test_no_tests_no_plan(self):
no_plan_log = test_data_path('test_is_test_passed-no_tests_no_plan.log')

@@ -206,7 +198,7 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase):

self.assertEqual(
kunit_parser.TestStatus.NO_TESTS,
result.subtests[0].subtests[0].status)
- self.assertEqual(1, result.counts.errors)
+ self.assertEqual(result.counts, kunit_parser.TestCounts(passed=1, errors=1))


def test_no_kunit_output(self):

@@ -218,6 +210,7 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase):

print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('could not find any KTAP output!'))
print_mock.stop()
self.assertEqual(0, len(result.subtests))
+ self.assertEqual(result.counts.errors, 1)

def test_skipped_test(self):
skipped_log = test_data_path('test_skip_tests.log')

@@ -225,18 +218,16 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase):

result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(file.readlines())

# A skipped test does not fail the whole suite.
- self.assertEqual(
- kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS,
- result.status)
+ self.assertEqual(kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS, result.status)
+ self.assertEqual(result.counts, kunit_parser.TestCounts(passed=4, skipped=1))

def test_skipped_all_tests(self):
skipped_log = test_data_path('test_skip_all_tests.log')
with open(skipped_log) as file:
result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(file.readlines())

- self.assertEqual(
- kunit_parser.TestStatus.SKIPPED,
- result.status)
+ self.assertEqual(kunit_parser.TestStatus.SKIPPED, result.status)
+ self.assertEqual(result.counts, kunit_parser.TestCounts(skipped=5))

def test_ignores_hyphen(self):
hyphen_log = test_data_path('test_strip_hyphen.log')

@@ -244,9 +235,7 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase):

result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(file.readlines())

# A skipped test does not fail the whole suite.
- self.assertEqual(
- kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS,
- result.status)
+ self.assertEqual(kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS, result.status)
self.assertEqual(
"sysctl_test",
result.subtests[0].name)

@@ -260,55 +249,49 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase):

prefix_log = test_data_path('test_config_printk_time.log')

def test_summarize_failures(self):
output = """
--
2.38.1.431.g37b22c650d-goog

[Daniel Latypov]

We're using a `with` block above, so the file object is already closed.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlat...@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davi...@google.com>
---
v1 -> v2: just rebased onto linux-kselftest/kunit
---

tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
index 5e3429a1202b..90c65b072be9 100755
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase):

self.assertEqual(
"example",
result.subtests[1].name)
- file.close()
-

def test_ignores_prefix_printk_time(self):

prefix_log = test_data_path('test_config_printk_time.log')

--
2.38.1.431.g37b22c650d-goog