[SIG-compute] Meeting Notes 2026-04-22

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Andrew Burden

unread,
Apr 24, 2026, 10:39:25 AM (5 days ago) Apr 24
to kubevirt-dev

2026-04-22 MINUTES


Recording: SIG - Compute 2026-04-22


Attendees: Aseef Imran Vladik Romanovsky Alay Patel US


Introductions: Welcome everyone to the KubeVirt weekly sig-compute meeting

  • Do we have any new members this week that would like to introduce themselves? 


Agenda and Notes:



Open Floor:


VEP Tracker:


Pull Requests that need attention: https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+label%3Asig%2Fcompute



Bug/issue scrub: https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/issues?q=is%3Aopen%20is%3Aissue%20label%3Asig%2Fcompute%20-label%3Akind%2Fflake 

(/triage {accepted | build-watcher | duplicate | needs-information | not-reproducible | unresolved})



Flake issue/PR scrub:

https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/issues?q=is%3Aopen%20label%3Asig%2Fcompute%20label%3Akind%2Fflake 

(/triage {accepted | build-watcher | duplicate | needs-information | not-reproducible | unresolved})




Zoom chat:
00:05:56 Jed Lejosne: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VTeHa-QxppNcDQbpoddrucBz1vXjxWB0JLARfS5Uuqs/edit

00:08:43 Punith Kenchappa: https://github.com/kubevirt/enhancements/issues/265

00:12:35 xpivarc: +1 for progamaticly tracking deps of fg...

00:13:09 Jed Lejosne: Another example is decentralized LM proxy that depends on decentralized LM

00:13:58 xpivarc: Do we need VEP, can we reuse VEP?

00:23:56 Jed Lejosne: Would it make sense to have CI automation running on PRs that touch feature gates and ensure deps sanity at that point?

00:24:31 lyarwood: IMHO this needs a VEP yes @xpivarc

00:25:26 Jed Lejosne: Maybe it can extend VEP 104?

00:26:24 fossedihelm: ALREADY
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages