--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Containers at Google" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-contain...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-c...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-containers.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
What happens to the cluster if the Master goes offline for an hour or two? That is, the Nodes can no longer contact the Master over the network. Would this cause any issues in production? I would think the Pods and Services would continue operating, except that no reconfiguration/monitoring would go on during the downtime.
And, do the cluster nodes themselves need to contact each other if they are located in multiple data centers to maintain the cluster's operation?
One last question... Can the Master be both the Master and one of the Nodes in the cluster? That is, can the scheduler consider the Master server when launching a Pod as a possible server for the new instance?
On Monday, August 17, 2015 at 3:29:11 PM UTC-4, Kevin Heatwole wrote:Is it okay to run the Kubernetes Master in a VM in some cloud provider and host the Nodes on bare metal servers in a potentially distant datacenter. How much latency in the network between the Master and the cluster Nodes is tolerable (for production deploy)?Or, should all of Kubernetes be hosted in servers within the same dc?I'm not clear on how fast the connection between Master and the cluster nodes needs to be. Can Kubernetes work well with 1 second latencies? Or, should pings be sub-millisecond?
--
That's not strictly true. It is possible, its just not the default setup, and if you do it, its possible that work scheduled onto the master will starve resources (or even oom) master components, so its worth being very careful and understand what you are doing.
Brendan