Re: [kubernetes/kubernetes] WIP - introduce ratcheting validation mechanism (#64907)

fejta-bot

unread,

Jan 27, 2019, 10:23:32 AM1/27/19

to kubernetes/kubernetes, k8s-mirror-storage-pr-reviews, Team mention

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

—
You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

Jordan Liggitt

unread,

Feb 9, 2019, 4:03:28 PM2/9/19

to kubernetes/kubernetes, k8s-mirror-storage-pr-reviews, Team mention

Closed #64907.

Clayton Coleman

unread,

Feb 18, 2019, 8:24:57 PM2/18/19

to kubernetes/kubernetes, k8s-mirror-storage-pr-reviews, Team mention

Fate of this?

Daniel Smith

unread,

Feb 19, 2019, 11:35:03 AM2/19/19

to kubernetes/kubernetes, k8s-mirror-storage-pr-reviews, Team mention

@smarterclayton It's solvable but with much more difficulty-- read from this comment to the end of the issue.

Jordan Liggitt

unread,

Feb 19, 2019, 11:46:56 AM2/19/19

to kubernetes/kubernetes, k8s-mirror-storage-pr-reviews, Team mention

@smarterclayton It's solvable but with much more difficulty-- read from this comment to the end of the issue.

If we limit ourselves to ratcheting in cases where the created objects were fatally flawed, I don't think we need to continue to accept invalid objects. I mostly closed this because I wasn't actively working on it.

Reply all

Reply to author

Forward