On 12/12/23 05:17, Max Neverov wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am reaching out to gather feedback on the proposed names for the
> ClusterCIDR Controller project
> <
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kubernetes-sig-network/570847fa-7171-4807-8799-d907df64dca4n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> as the demo we showcased at the last community meeting received some positive feedback.
> As we aim to move the existing ClusterCIDR CRD and functionality out of
> the Kubernetes tree and establish it as a standalone project, we want to
> ensure the name accurately reflects the project's role and resonates
> with the community.
>
> We would like to seek your valuable input on the proposed names.
>
> cidr-node-controller
> node-ipam-controller
> cluster-cidr-controller
> node-ipam-service-gateway-policy-controller
I vote for node-ipam-controller, and vote strongly against
cluster-cidr-controller, because that's a bad name, because it doesn't
let you control the cluster CIDR.
-- Dan
>
> If you have additional suggestions or preferences, please feel free to
> share them in your response.
>
> To vote or suggest a new name, simply reply to this email with your
> preferred option or provide your alternative suggestion.
>
> Best regards,
> Max Neverov
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "kubernetes-sig-network" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to
kubernetes-sig-ne...@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:
kubernetes-sig-ne...@googlegroups.com>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
>
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kubernetes-sig-network/ebf2e218-00bb-4dc9-b2e0-f858a3b7c326n%40googlegroups.com <
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kubernetes-sig-network/ebf2e218-00bb-4dc9-b2e0-f858a3b7c326n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.