@smarterclayton @kubernetes/sig-cli-feature-requests @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-feature-requests still on track for 1.10?
—
You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
We're trying to close the loop on the 1.10 plan
@smarterclayton any progress?
Yes, we are planning to bring this to beta in 1.10. Work is being tracked in kubernetes/kubernetes#58536
@smarterclayton sorry, I thought I had pinged you about this earlier. If this feature needs docs, can you please get a PR in in the next day or so? We need to merge all docs PRs by this Friday (March 9). If not, can you please indicate on the feature tracking spreadsheet? Thanks!
@juanvallejo can you add a doc?
@smarterclayton sure, will add doc
@smarterclayton
Any plans for this in 1.11?
If so, can you please ensure the feature is up-to-date with the appropriate:
stage/{alpha,beta,stable}
sig/*
kind/feature
cc @idvoretskyi
@juanvallejo can you add details about the 1.11 planned things? I think we should try to get custom CRD columns on the server side in 1.11 with a minimal alpha api. I can bump the stable target to 1.12
The current tracking issue can be found in kubernetes/kubernetes#60712.
+1 for bumping this to stable in 1.12.
Thanks for the update!
@justaugustus Does this need to be removed from the spreadsheet?
@mistyhacks just fixed it!
@soltysh @smarterclayton @juanvallejo @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-feature-requests @kubernetes/sig-cli-feature-requests --
This feature was removed from the previous milestone, so we'd like to check in and see if there are any plans for this in Kubernetes 1.12.
If so, please ensure that this issue is up-to-date with ALL of the following information:
Set the following:
Please make sure all PRs for features have relevant release notes included as well.
Happy shipping!
/cc @justaugustus @kacole2 @robertsandoval @rajendar38
@soltysh @smarterclayton @juanvallejo --
Feature Freeze is today. Are we planning on graduating this feature in Kubernetes 1.12?
If so, can you make sure everything is up-to-date, so I can include it on the 1.12 Feature tracking spreadsheet?
@justaugustus I've updated the description, and moved the target stable from 1.12 to 1.13. We need to stabilize current API a bit more. And there are still some bits and nits that needs fixing. So that's what we'll focus on in 1.12.
Sounds good. Thanks for the update, @soltysh!
/remove-stage beta
/stage stable
Hi @soltysh @smarterclayton
This enhancement has been tracked before, so we'd like to check in and see if there are any plans for this to graduate stages in Kubernetes 1.13. This release is targeted to be more ‘stable’ and will have an aggressive timeline. Please only include this enhancement if there is a high level of confidence it will meet the following deadlines:
Docs (open placeholder PRs): 11/8
Code Slush: 11/9
Code Freeze Begins: 11/15
Docs Complete and Reviewed: 11/27
Please take a moment to update the milestones on your original post for future tracking and ping @kacole2 if it needs to be included in the 1.13 Enhancements Tracking Sheet
Thanks!
@soltysh what work if left in k/k for this feature to go to stable in 1.13? Is there a list of pending PRs (code, tests and docs) that we can track on our end? how confident are you in stabilizing the API in the short 1.13 timeframe ?
Hi @soltysh There has been no communication on the status of this enhancement and I could not find any linked pull requests. Are we confident this is going to make the v1.13 milestone? Enhancement freeze is tomorrow COB. If there is no communication or update on the PR, this is going to be pulled from the milestone as it doesn't fit with our "stability" theme. If there is no communication after COB tomorrow, an exception will be required to add it back to the milestone. Please let me or @kacole2 know where we stand. Thanks!
/milestone clear
@AishSundar sorry for getting to it that late, I'm fine moving it further. We're still working on other related stuff, so this will not go into stable in 1.13. We need 100% confidence before we do so, that's why I removed any version from stable stage in the original description.
Ack that and thanks @soltysh
(Some automation I'm testing accidentally sent out a comment, which I've deleted to not make things confusing. Sorry!)
@smarterclayton Hello - I’m the enhancement’s lead for 1.14 and I’m checking in on this issue to see what work (if any) is being planned for the 1.14 release. Enhancements freeze is Jan 29th and I want to remind that all enhancements must have a KEP
Hello @smarterclayton, I'm the Enhancement Lead for 1.15. Is this feature going to be graduating alpha/beta/stable stages in 1.15? Please let me know so it can be tracked properly and added to the spreadsheet. KEP needs to be merged before promotion as well.
Once coding begins, please list all relevant k/k PRs in this issue so they can be tracked properly.
Yes, the API for this feature is targeted for stable API in 1.15.
KEP in implementable: https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/blob/master/keps/sig-api-machinery/20190322-server-side-get-to-ga.md
/milestone 1.15
@smarterclayton: You must be a member of the kubernetes/kubernetes-milestone-maintainers GitHub team to set the milestone. If you believe you should be able to issue the /milestone command, please contact your and have them propose you as an additional delegate for this responsibility.
In response to this:
/milestone 1.15
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.
/milestone v1.15
Hey, @soltysh @smarterclayton @juanvallejo 👋 I'm the v1.15 docs Lead.
Does this enhancement require any new docs (or modifications)?
Just a friendly reminder we're looking for a PR against k/website (branch dev-1.15) due by Thursday, May 30th. It would be great if it's the start of the full documentation, but even a placeholder PR is acceptable. Let me know if you have any questions
@smarterclayton Noted. so this means it won't require any PR submitted to k/website
Hi @smarterclayton . Code Freeze is Thursday, May 30th 2019 @ EOD PST. All enhancements going into the release must be code-complete, including tests, and have docs PRs open.
Please list all current k/k PRs so they can be tracked going into freeze. If the PRs aren't merged by freeze, this feature will slip for the 1.15 release cycle. Only release-blocking issues and PRs will be allowed in the milestone.
The one I currently see in this issue is #76789. Let me know if there are missing ones.
If you know this will slip, please reply back and let us know. Thanks!
Hi @smarterclayton @soltysh , today is code freeze for the 1.15 release cycle. I do not see a reply for any k/k PRs to track for this merge. It's now being marked as At Risk in the 1.15 Enhancement Tracking Sheet. If there is no response, or you respond with PRs to track and they are not merged by EOD PST, this will be dropped from the 1.15 Milestone. After this point, only release-blocking issues and PRs will be allowed in the milestone with an exception.
This has graduated to stable and been implemented. Time to close
/milestone clear
/close
Closed #515.
@kacole2: Closing this issue.
In response to this:
This has graduated to stable and been implemented. Time to close
/milestone clear
/close
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.
—
The describe part of this enhancement isn't implemented, yet.
/re-open
—
You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS or Android.
/reopen
@pacoxu: Reopened this issue.
In response to this:
/reopen
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.
—
Reopened #515.
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/remove-lifecycle stale
/lifecycle rotten
/close
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/remove-lifecycle rotten
/close
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle rotten
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS or Android.
You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned.
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/reopen
/remove-lifecycle rotten
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS or Android.
You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned.
@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue.
In response to this:
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/stale
is applied- After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stale
was applied,lifecycle/rotten
is applied- After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
- Reopen this issue or PR with
/reopen
- Mark this issue or PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten
- Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS or Android.
You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned.
Closed #515.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS or Android.
You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned.