Re: Persistent Volume Recycler Deprecation Annoucement

[Sarah Novotny]

reposting to kubernetes-announce@ and kubernetes-dev@

Thanks, Erin.

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Erin Boyd <eb...@redhat.com> wrote:

If you don't  use: persistentVolumeReclaimPolicy: Recycle
you can stop reading now.

Currently, the persistent volume specification has an option to recycle a volume, essentially performing “rm -rf /thevolume/*” on the user's volume. This method has proven to be error prone and ineffective in all situations thus leaving the possibility of exposing the previous user's data to the new user of the PV. Dynamic provisioning of volumes with the ability to delete the volume, provide a more robust solution to quick allocation of new volumes while eliminating the risk of inadvertently exposing user data.  If you are using this feature we would like your feedback to this simple survey: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScdGzEtIJ0f9oPjOz2aZ4qReRGq4XfsYJhCfRMlEnFmyCKXdg/viewform

For more information or if you have additional comments or concerns, please follow the discussion on the issue here: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/36760

Thank you,

Erin A Boyd
https://github.com/erinboyd 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "kubernetes-sig-storage" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kubernetes-sig-storage+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to kubernetes-sig-storage@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kubernetes-sig-storage/CAJhxK-%3DW2f7yOhs-mB38v9Fk5-JJ6fbdhvkAPyvbL%2BJ%2B834fpQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.