kubernetes-api-reviewers

Hello API reviewers, At the Checkpoint/Restore Working Group we have been working on KEP-5823 [1]

Hello K8S, I need API review for the PR I have done. Can you please review the PR? https://github.com

Heads up that the old-style github project tracking API reviews has been migrated to a new-style

Thanks all, PR open at https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/116918 On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 4

We store all versioned API definitions in `staging/src/k8s.io/api/<name>/<version>`.

On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 4:20 PM 'Rahul Joshi' via kubernetes-api-reviewers <kubernetes-api

"actor", "requestor", "originator/origination", "source"?

Clayton, What's a good place to doc this? -- Dims On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 3:53 PM 'Tim Hockin

so many comments! Replying all at once. > This seems like a large improvement, in that now

I've been thinking about some of the poor interactions between field immutability and declarative

The PR is in my fork as it contains only the API change and not the implementation yet, so it is not

Hi, I've had an api PR change open for a while now https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/

+ kubernetes-api-reviewers, kubernetes-sig-leads On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 10:00 AM Jordan Liggitt <

Thanks for reaching out. The PR is tracked in the project board and has Clayton assigned to it. On

I'll note when we added the Proc mount behavior (so people could do rootless as non-root), we

This is a good discussion for us to be having. I've put some of my thoughts into a github issue

The PR didn't make it into code freeze anyways. We're preparing for better communication and

I see a wide variety of ways that features are handling the "behave as if the feature didn't

sure, though it would be good to make sure we hoist the outcomes of anything significant to a more

While we're on this topic, maybe we can craft stronger guidance around validations and how to use

SIG leads / subproject owners: For 1.15 API reviews we'll be iterating on the shadowing approach

I assume/hope that most of the 104 PRs tagged kind/api-change either aren't active or aren't

On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 9:26 AM Joe Beda <j...@heptio.com> wrote: One slightly related thing

Adding +kubernetes-a...@googlegroups.com On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 3:33 PM 'Tim Allclair

What is our thinking about API types for which there is no status. Consider ConfigMap (also

I am happy to take this - I think it may need some design review and not just API review. That said,

Hello Kubernetes API Reviewer team, I need your assistance with the API review process document. You