On Apr 12, 2018, at 4:50 PM, Markus <123mar...@gmail.com> wrote:
hello Dominique,The advantage of this solution would be the cost. A dedicated JTAG programmer is expensive.
The disadvantage would be a slight decrease in speed, and it won't be integrated into Xilinx software. So you can use it to program the FPGA but you can't use the debugger from SDK.have you had a look at Derek's Post? He was using XilinxVirtualCable to integrate his JTAG server with the Xilinx tools. He run a hardware server on his raspberry pi. I don't know if his solution has any limitations, seems like it fully integrates in Vivado.
Am Donnerstag, 12. April 2018 20:39:24 UTC+1 schrieb Dominique Torette:According to Snickerdoodle schematic sheet 4, there is a link between the [K] Platform Controller and ZYNQ_JTAG.With the recent release of both:It could be possible to provide Snickerdoodle STM32 firmware with DirtyJTAG services (or similar JTAG SW I/F as per https://github.com/jeanthom/DirtyJTAG#inspiration--links)If well understood, this solution could avoid the purchase of a dedicated JTAG I/F. What could be the pros/cons of such solution ? Anyone interested in such port ?Regards, Dominique Torette.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "snickerdoodle forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to krtkl-snickerdo...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/krtkl-snickerdoodle/2535ee51-7275-483c-9e6a-71f50097c646%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Anyone interested in such port ?Regards, Dominique Torette.