I think this would be an excellent idea. Life-cycle of a store may
well be shorter than that of the system that uses it.
-+ Tatu +-
close() can take a while, normally more than the end user would wait. Can the closing operation be done in a background thread?
Hi Rodolfo,
It is safe to call close() in a background thread. However, calls to
methods get/set/put etc will be impacted and exceptions (such as
NullPointerException) may be thrown.