Unetbootin Linux Download

[Joke Grinman]

Ascommented in your question by Web-E , you should just add the executable permission to the file downloaded from SourceForge, then you are able to run it (no installation needed, btw). I had the same problem and that comment gave me the solution, without the need to add the ppa.

If you don't want to use terminal, you can right-click the file unetbootin-linux-585, select "properties", go to "permissions" and then tick "allow execution of the file as a program" (or something like that, i don't have an english-language o.s.).

To make the file executable via terminal (and we are here supposing you downloaded that file using a browser like Firefox or Opera), you only have to go to the folder where the file resides, right-click on the folder and select "Open terminal here". When you have the terminal shell, don't forget to run

And to use UNetbootin, there is basically two different option, one is to install downloading the distribution as mentioned by the UNetbootin itself and next is to select Disk Image and choose ISO files.

I am trying to install UNetbootin on my Linux Mint (12 - KDE) machine and it will not run. I downloaded the Linux version of it (downloads as a unetbootin-linux-581 file) and set its permission to chmod +x unetbootin-linux-581. I've tried running it every way I can think of:

From the command line something like sudo apt-get install unetbootin would be the easiest way. If you are not comfortable with the command line then using the synaptic package manager on Ubuntu or the Software Center would be the best choices using a GUI.

Hello,

Things are going better, but it still doesn't work.

May be it works better because I downloaded Python3 ? I don't know.

I installed again unetbootin_608-1_i386.deb from the xenial 32 PPM

Opening it from the menu, I cannot choose the USB to witch I want to install puppy linux. But opening the console and writing "unetbootin installtype=usb targetdrive=/dev/sdx" (where sdx is the USB I want), it opens unetbootin with my USB choice. Then, I can select the Iso I want to install (bionic 32, I already downloaded on another USB), and "OK". Everything looks to work fine, watching Unetbootin working, but, when I want to boot this USB (sdx) I have this message : "missing operating system".

Opening the USB (sdx), I have this : !Ajgd8QNjPIT0hHknRtD1Biq7TDMX . Something is missing ? What is wrong ?

Any idea to solve the problem ?

I read this : ... 88#p851153 but I did not found how to do. May be it is because I do not speak well enough english (foreign language for me)

Thank you for your help

Hello,

Thank you rcrsn. It is nice from you to try to help me.

You wrote : "Since 2011, the most reliable tool for non-UEFI machines has been isobooter". So, I understand that this tool will not work properly with UEFI machines.

Unetbootin works perfectly with windows...

I just should like it works as well with Linux. Do you think it is imposible ? With only a little experience with linux, I need something as simple as unetbootin : I just need to select the USB I want to use, and select the ISO to install. Nothing more ! Do you know another toll as much simple, working as well for non-UEFI as for UEFI machines, or must I go on with unetbootin for windows ?

Thank you

Unetbootin is a good choice if you only have windows to work from. For installing puppies from linux, I would keep a puppy cd or usb available, as it has, or can easily use, puppy specific installers along with included partition tools and bootloaders, the use of which is better documented by the community.

Doug McIlroy on Unix programming

McIlroy, then head of the Bell Labs Computing Sciences Research Center ....... summarized the Unix philosophy as follows. "This is the Unix philosophy: Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write programs to work together"

Thank you very much.

it is very interesting !

I gave a try. sdd1 is the target, sde1 is where the iso is

First problem : in balenaEtcher, both sdd1 and sde1 are unknow...

Well, I put the ISO in root. But I can do nothing for the target sdd1...

And you can see all I have done there : !Ajgd8QNjPIT0hHoAXFk ... T?e=9YaSjL

I don't understand how to follow the instructions given. Do you have any idea ?

Thank you for your help.

I use xenial 32 bits for 2 reasons :

- It works perfectly, and I do not need anything more.

- when I travel around the world, I use a very old netbook 32 bits (Asus Eee 701 PC), nobody will want to stole. It depends where I am, but it is not always posible to keep the computer in a safe place when I am traveling. So when, I travel, I can remove my bootable USB from my usual computer at home (Acer aspire 7715Z) and I can use my bootable USB with the netbook. I have, too, puppy linux, xenial 32, in full install in this netbook, which works perfectly for what I need when I am traveling : Internet (with slimjet), Abiword, take a shot, pdf, and gimagereader (OCR) for languages I don't know, and, if I need it, I use my bootable xenial 32 USB, and another storage USB in which I have many files.

These are the reasons why puppy linux became my usual system.

But, even if I don't use it often, I have windows on my Acer aspire, with unetbootin which works perfectly. Now I use windows only when I need unetbootin...

It is a pity I cannot install unetbootin in xenial 32 or another similar tool...

So, if it isn't posible to install unetbootin in xenial 32, I will go on to use unetbotin for windows...

It does not "install" a frugal Puppy on USB. As a result, with a Unetbootin produced "liveCD" on USB, you can utilize a pupsavefile which resides on your hard drive, unlike many USB installs, which only want to work with a savefile located on the USB drive.

The people here are advising against its use because it's known to break some live systems.

And for all the distributions you just listed, writing the images to a USB drive with `dd` works fine, so there is no need to use unetbootin there.

This is a very odd thread. By all means suggest alternatives to unetbootin. I don't use it and certainly never will. But when suggesting alternatives takes on the flavor of suggesting that the OP shouldn't care that the unetbootin program doesn't run properly it has gone too far. Unetbootin is actively maintained in the [community] repo. If the program does not run as intended, it is a bug that warrants fixing. And if the OP's problem and workaround is reproducible by others, then this should be filed as a bug on the bugtracker as the allegedly-problematic shell script is distributed with the arch package and not from upstream.

Trilby's post made me realise that I have overread the "multi-boot" part (I think this is where OP wants to go). Yes, unetbootin itself is not broken - it just doesn't work very well for at least Arch Linux.

UNetbootin can be used to quickly create a Live Linux USB flash drive from an ISO file. There are versions of this cross-platform Live USB generation utility for Windows, Linux, and MacOS X. The fact that this bootable USB creator works with every major operating system is a benefit.

UNetbootin (short for "Universal Netboot Installer") is an open source software application that allows users to create bootable Live USB drives for various Linux distributions from ISO files, eliminating the need to use a CD. Making it a convenient tool for users who want to try out or install Linux on a computer without using a traditional installation disc. Originally authored by Geza Kovacs, it was released under GNU GPL v2. You can read more about it at the Official Project Page.

Keep in mind that while this is a pretty popular tool, there are alternative methods and tools for creating bootable USB drives, such as the Universal bootable USB Installer, YUMI, Ventoy, Rufus, Etcher, or the native tools provided by many Linux distributions. The choice of tool often depends on personal preference and the specific requirements of the user.

It is important to mention that at the time of this writing, Live Linux USB flash drives created with this tool do not utilize a persistence feature. The resulting bootable USB Linux install will function just as it does from a Live CD. By default you will not be able to save and restore your changes. Additionally, only one distribution can be put on the flash drive.

If you wish to store and boot multiple Linux distributions with persistence, system utilities, and Windows Installers, you should probably use a previously mentioned tool like YUMI Multiboot ISO to USB, instead.

The following assumes you are working from within Windows and have a current copy of the ISO you wish to convert. So before proceeding, make sure to have a copy of your favorite Linux ISO file on hand. Then, to get started using UNetbootin to make a Live Linux USB from within Windows:

This Live USB creation tool can also be used to create a Live Linux USB flash drive from within Linux. In the following section, I cover how to quickly get it up and running within an Ubuntu Linux operating environment.

* Alternately, if an archive manager utility is already installed, you might be able to simply double click the unetbootin-linux-* file to run it, since the archive was already marked executable during step 2.

Both Mint and Ubuntu can work with UEFI booting with Windows and you do not have to switch it off (switch into legacy boot) if you have used the usb-creator or the dd method. However, I am not certain that unetbootin allows a UEFI boot. Perhaps others can clarify this aspect.

3a8082e126