Availability of 32 bit version of k (for comparisons to kona)

[Tom Szczesny]

Dennis Shasha

11:32 AM (3 hours ago)

Nice. The 32 bit version of k is also available.
I know the linux part works well. Have not tried the windows version.

To begin with, therefore, please download trial K from
<a href="http://cs.nyu.edu/cs/faculty/shasha/papers/k"> for a sun version</a>
and a pair of files for windows consisting of
<a href="http://cs.nyu.edu/cs/faculty/shasha/papers/k.exe">
k.exe</a>
and
<a href="http://cs.nyu.edu/cs/faculty/shasha/papers/k20.dll">
k20.dll </a>
and a
<a href="http://cs.nyu.edu/cs/faculty/shasha/papers/klinux"
linux version </a>.

In both cases, you will also need
<a href="http://cs.nyu.edu/cs/faculty/shasha/papers/db.kr">
db.kr </a>.

[Tom Szczesny]

Actually, it's not optimal for comparison.

The capabilities of kona are modeled on k3.2

The 32-bit evaluation version (not for commercial use) available from cs.nyu.edu is k2.8

There are significant differences.

(I wonder if kx systems might allow us to make a  k3.2 evaluation copy available.)

[Tom Szczesny]

On Friday, July 19, 2013 Bakul Shah wrote:

>  I think there are very few differences between 2.8 and 3.2
>  (performance improvement, error checking, a few _ variables
>  etc). These were documented somewhere on kx.com.

[Tom Szczesny]

I'm surprised to hear that the Windows version is not accessible.

Does the Linux version work?

It used to ... when I downloaded it years ago.

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:18 PM, C.-J. Mei <cjm...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi, Tom,

   The windows version library is not accessible. You have to grand permissions.

C.-J.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Kona Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kona-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[Tom Szczesny]

When last checked, this website was no longer reachable.

On Friday, July 19, 2013 at 2:25:59 PM UTC-4, Tom Szczesny wrote: