You're also right in assuming that Kochief is pretty focused around
MARC records at this point. There are a couple of example alternatives
in discovery/parsers/ if you need to parse another format. At Drexel,
I index MARC dumps from our III catalog in Kochief nightly.
GoDaddy is rotten in many ways, including Django support. You'll have
some trouble there. If you have any flexibility I'd recommend
switching to WebFaction.
Great to see the interest in Kochief. Feel free to post any questions
you have to this list.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Kochief" group.
> To post to this group, send email to koc...@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> kochief+u...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/kochief
Paul Smith's is actually using VuFind: http://vufind.org/
They used to use Kochief, but migrated to VuFind a few months ago.
> At drexel, it seems kochief is only sued for their beta Collections section,
> and the rest of the library is something else (proprietary).
>
> this is not kicohief?:
> http://innoserv.library.drexel.edu/search/
>
That's just III's Innopac. I believe Drexel is about to implement
Summon (or maybe has) for the primary search.
-Ross.
> So, is making something as clean and clear as paul smith's page very (very)
> labor intensive, or is drexel trying to use only a small portion of kochief
> for their very small collection? Like, where is search by subject or
> author?
>
> thanks,
> Elliot
>
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 5:28 PM, ... <offonoff...@gmail.com> wrote:Well....
> As far as the example pages go, Paul smith's site
> (http://library.paulsmiths.edu/catalog/) looks really good. I especially
> like the break down of search criteria on the left side.
>
Paul Smith's is actually using VuFind: http://vufind.org/
They used to use Kochief, but migrated to VuFind a few months ago.
Mark A. Matienzo
Digital Archivist, Manuscripts and Archives
Yale University Library
Kochief doesn't use models for the most part. It is mostly a discovery
interface over a Solr index, just like VuFind and Blacklight.
Gabe did
do some work on a "cataloging" application which was previously
referenced in this thread, which is where you're getting the Resource
model from.
I had created the Resource model while looking in the direction of
Linked Data. At first I thought I could plug into a triplestore like
RDFLib but decided to abuse the Django ORM instead. I also considered
using a document store like CouchDB, or again twisting the ORM in a
way similar to ThingDB, since Solr is document-oriented.
Much of this was an attempt to keep Kochief more flexible, able to
ingest according to a wide variety of datamodels. For your own
purposes, however, you might simplify things by using the standard
Django models in the way they're meant to be used, with a Book class
and a Journal class and whatnot.
For your own
purposes, however, you might simplify things by using the standard
Django models in the way they're meant to be used, with a Book class
and a Journal class and whatnot.
Documents in Solr must have an ID. The parser assigns them on import.
Records from III, for example, get the III BibID. The default we use
for MARC record parsing is the 001 field.