Fear Files Review
Chadwick Bosse
Hi. My wife somehow deleted 4,000 files back in October and did other things that I fear may be zapping her dropbox. I can still restore these files (I think) but I want to restore to a new location, e.g. create a folder called recoveredfiles and send everything to it. Recovery to original locations seems easy enough but I don't see anything on changing the location. I'm surprised there doesn't seem to be any way to do this. Or is there? Thanks!
What makes this so bizarre is that it looks like a mega folder was deleted, but files were still being accessed somehow through .dropbox.cache! My guess is that when she couldn't find files she searched for them and found them in the cache, and kept using the cache.
This makes me very nervous, as I fear files may have gotten deleted or corrupted in the cache. Indeed I am surprised the files were even there as I thought the cache got cleared every few days. I recreated the mega folder but I fear it has problems that may not get discovered until it is too late to fix them.
At the heart of T. Harv Eker's sixteenth wealth file, "Act In Spite Of Fear," lies the idea that fear and hesitation, if unchecked, can be significant barriers to attaining financial success and personal growth.
From entrepreneurs who venture into the uncertain world of startups, to investors diving into fluctuating markets, to young professionals considering a career shift, the experience of trepidation is a universal one.
In the public eye, this principle is often manifest in stories of successful individuals who overcame significant odds, took leaps of faith, and found success not in the absence of fear, but in their decision to act despite it.
Many understand and accept this, recognizing that while fear is an innate human emotion, the ability to act in spite of it can be the distinguishing factor in one's journey to financial freedom and success.
In the sixteenth wealth file, T. Harv Eker dives deep into the concept of confronting and overcoming one's financial fears. His message, boiled down, suggests that the wealthy face their anxieties and doubts head-on, acting despite them.
This interaction led to the attendee not only attending the event but also encouraging others to do so, illustrating Eker's point that success requires a warrior-like mindset, ready to overcome any obstacle, as well as act in spite of fear and doubt.
A recurring theme in public discourse emphasizes the need to differentiate between paralyzing fear and genuine caution, suggesting that while the former should be confronted, the latter should be heeded.
Your review is like a legacy, so if you liked this post, leave a good star rating, and if not, leave a poor rating - but good or bad, please leave a comment in the ratings, review, and comments section at the bottom of this post and let others know what you think.
On June 21, 2024, the Third Circuit ruled that the Court has jurisdiction to review fear-based claims arising in reasonable fear or withholding-only proceedings if the noncitizen files a petition for review within 30 days of the conclusion of those proceedings. The court also held that the deadline for filing a petition for review is not jurisdictional, but is instead a claims-processing rule. In so ruling, the Court adopted the arguments that NILA made as amicus. To read the decision, click here.
All reviews of published articles are made public. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials. Note: This was optional for articles submitted before 13 February 2023.
Peer reviewers are encouraged (but not required) to provide their names to the authors when submitting their peer review. If they agree to provide their name, then their personal profile page will reflect a public acknowledgment that they performed a review (even if the article is rejected). If the article is accepted, then reviewers who provided their name will be associated with the article itself.
This study investigates how children's experiences as Haitian refugees influence the development of atypical childhood fears. Eighteen child refugees were interviewed about their personal primary fear objects and their interpretation of fear in a series of drawing and picture observation exercises. Five of these eighteen children were Haitian refugees. Each of the refugee children had one adult representative who was interviewed about the child, the family's demographic information, and the child's previous traumatic experiences in his/her native country. The refugee children and their adult representatives' responses to the interview questions were coded and analyzed according to themes. Results suggest that Haitian refugee children have a higher rate of moderately life-threatening and life-threatening previous traumatic experiences. Results also indicate that the majority of Haitian refugee children reported amphibians as their primary fear objects, suggesting that the geographic location and characteristics of Haiti contribute to the development of Haitian children's primary fear objects. While animal and imaginary/cultural creatures may be the most prominently identified and interpreted Haitian fear, Haitian refugee children may interpret more life-threatening fears when prompted by the image of a child under a tree.
Jessy will be graduating from UCF in Spring 2014 with a B.S. in Psychology and a minor in Early Childhood Development and Education. During her time at UCF, she was very involved in researching and serving the refugee community in the Central Florida area. Jessy completed the Honors in the Major program, served as a research peer mentor for the 2013 Summer Research Academy, presented research at four national conferences, and held RA positions in both the Psychology Department and the School of Teaching, Learning, and Leadership at UCF. Jessy will be pursuing a master's degree in Global Health in Fall 2014, where she will continue to research the mental and physical health of refugees in the US and overseas. After earning her master's, Jessy plans on attending a Ph.D. program that will allow her to pursue her dream of becoming an international refugee researcher.
NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.
Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 22 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plo...@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.
Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
- A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
- A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
- An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.
If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: -guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at _medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.
2. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see -availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.
a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.
b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see -availability#loc-recommended-repositories.
4. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: -information.
c80f0f1006