I have been thinking about many of the questions you asked. If you
consider the diagrams to be on a sphere (I believe you called it a
stereographic projection, or something similar) then many of them
become equivalent. I haven't yet tried to find out which are
equivalent, or if there is a way to find it in the general case. I do
find it noteworthy that if one considers diagrams on a sphere then my
weave diagram example (from my other pdf file) doesn't work because
the two diagrams are the same. Assuming the weave example was a
counterexample (which I don't know if it is) it raises the question of
if there is a counterexample that uses diagrams on a sphere.
I don't yet have a conjecture for the relationship between the number
of bounded regions and the number of crossings. This is something
that I am trying to figure out. My current ideas on how to get this is
to first come up with an algorithm to write down all of these, and
then derive from this the number of bounded region diagrams given
there are a certain number of regions.
On a side note, the bounded regions are probably just what you think
they are, I just haven't defined them very well. Where you say there
are some bounded regions that aren't shaded it is probably the white
regions. I considered white a shading as I didn't want to try and
shade three different levels. So in each picture there are three
colors, and the "outside" part of the diagram is not a bounded region.
As for the last questions, it seems like there might be a way to
relate the number of diagrams to the number of bounded regions, and
the order of the symmetry of the group. That is what I am trying to
find, but I haven't yet. If it does work out there might be a nice
formula for the number of diagrams with n crossings. Also (if the
above questions can be answered) it seems that there might be an
algorithm given for drawing all diagrams. Last night I tried listing
all circle diagrams for a three crossing diagram, but became too tired
to finish. I'll have to try again today.
> Dn