test(undefined) doesn't seem to do the job, as this interpreted as a
read call...
Kind regards,
Bert Bruynooghe.
What about just
test = ko.observable(); just like when you first initialize it?
Fair enough. Can you not just set it to null?
test(null)
Btw, I had the same problem in 1.2.1 when trying test(0), in a case
where I wanted to maintain the index. Not sure if this last situation
is still a problem in 1.3 ...
On 14 dec, 18:23, Stacey Thornton <stacey.cielia.l...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Fair enough. Can you not just set it to null?
>
> test(null)
-- Michael