KGC Vrs Knights Templar

17 views
Skip to first unread message

CCC

unread,
Mar 26, 2012, 9:31:04 AM3/26/12
to knights-of-the...@googlegroups.com
KGC Vrs Knights Templar
The Treasures of Utah
http://thetreasuresofutah.yuku.com/topic/1836/KGC-Vrs-Knights-Templar?page=1
Last Edited By: Digger II 03/18/12 07:54 AM. Edited 2 times
 

Knights of the Golden Circle,
K.G.C vs. Nights Templar.
 
In order to understand the system of secrecy in the cryptic writings of the KGC, one might want to have a good understanding of who they were and why they existed.
This may or may not help you in deciphering the glyphs that you may encounter.
 
First let us clarify who they were and who they were not.
The agenda of those who make up the KGC have existed since the founding of this country, they are those who took pleasure in Slave Trading and viewed the Constitution as a “tyrannical document, since it prohibited the slave-trade, and regarded it as a system of piracy.”
 
Although these people began to organize as early as 1834 called SRC’s Southern Rights Clubs, it had not received its name of Knights of the Golden Circle or KGC until about 1855.
 
Their primary agenda was to maintain slave trade, although other motives came into play after the War Between the States. Some, including myself at one time viewed the KGC as a righteous bunch with the objective to save the Constitution and bring back the Republic which was over thrown in that war, in my opinion, this couldn’t be further from the truth and yet I could be wrong.
 
I used to believe that not only those of the KGC, North and South and the majority of the South, actually understood what happened in the War Between the States, It would seem I was wrong, although many of the South and North realized the full impact of what Lincoln actually did, the short of it is, he sold us out to the Bankers of his own admission.
 
The KGC is NOT a continuance of the Knights Templar of ancient origin nor is there any relationship, similarities, motives or objectives. Masons have NO TIES with KGC as many would assume, however I am certain there are/were occurrences of a KGC member who is/was also a member of the Masons. However if there was, I would wonder how they could play on both sides of the fence.
DO NOT confuse secret with Sacred...
 
Masons of the past and even the present as far as I am concerned, have no sinister motives other than the possibility of the individual views of a single corrupt member and although much has been lost since ancient times, for the most part they remain as they always have been. In fact, circumstances and occurrences in the early 1800’s have helped many members realize their origin. We will leave it at that, and by no means take my word for it.
 
As for Knights Templar and Masons I would have no doubt of similar if not the same origins, one stemming from the other, however in their beginnings, motives and agendas was different. Knights Templar as you have heard and read so often always seem to be tied with the Holy Grail which is in part true, However if you truly believe that a bunch of guys were organized for the purpose of protecting a wooden cup, I have some beach front property in Arizona to sell you. Holy Grail with Grail defined, first the materialistic view, 1. Grail, A cup or plate that, according to medieval legend, was used by Jesus at the Last Supper and that later became the object of many chivalrous quests. Also called Holy Grail.
 
And now for a more realistic view, 2. often Grail The object of a prolonged endeavor.
 
The short of it is, Holy Blood[line]. All of you who have ever read and studied the ways of the Kings of the past know the importance and traditions of the succession of Kings, Princes and Princesses, the rules of marriage and such, why were they like this? The object of this, borrowed from the times of Christ was in to preserve the Holy Blood line they may have had, assumed they had or thought they had. My question is, where is the beginnings of this Holy Blood they may have, thought or assumed they had?
 
We of the Christian sects believe we had an example of a man, sent here to redeem the world that all may be saved, sent to be an example to all, and yet this example to the world in all his teachings having to do with the family does not he himself marry? Are we assuming he was a hypocrite or do we just see that he was, IF this were the case?
 
I for one do not believe he was a hypocrite, and believe he was a perfect example to the world for all to see. MANY knew of the wive[s] of Christ long before the Da Vinci Code.
 
This was the primary objective of the Knights Templar even to the days when those of so called Royal Blood could not let them continue in their quest to protect and keep hidden, the true Royal Blood of those decent from the Master for fear one might step forward and take the throne they thought they had right to. Do we wonder why the kings of old felt they only had the right to more than one wife? Where would they get such an idea?
 
It would seem that one of these assumed Royal Blood descendants, King Phillip IV in about 1307 saw the threat of the potential rise of an actual Royal Blood descendent and through other supposed means set out to discredit and destroy the Order of the Knights.
 
There is so much more to this however, unfortunately we have largely only the writings of the Victors to go on.
 
The Holy Grail being a prime objective of the Ancient Order, it was not the only responsibility of the Order. It is likely that those of the Ancient Order were of the tribe of Levi, which might give some of you a clue as to another responsibility of this order. And this responsibility is almost if not just as important in the preservation of the Holy Blood, and that is the preservation of the Ancient Covenant written as a guide to the House of Israel, a witness FOR or Against them, to be read in the last days that they may receive their inheritance, or be condemned, and this will take place at the final gathering at the building of the New Jerusalem, and this gathering has already begun, the stones for the walls and Temples already cut.
 
We hear of the many who came to this continent and the many claims as to who first discovered it which I never understood as there is not a one of the claims that acknowledges those who were here when they got here. WHY did they come? What were their motives?
 
We read or hear of the Knights Templar coming here in the 1300’s, the Vikings from years before, Prince Madoc and the like, Columbus, the Spaniard etc….
 
Why were they coming here? My personal belief based on things I will not give here, is that they were all looking for the same thing, we may not read about it or hear about it but make no mistake, in the backs of the minds of each of them, they were looking for the same thing and they all knew it disappeared from Jerusalem just before its destruction about 600 BC. The Templar was merely following a very old trail as was Madoc, each following their own interpretation of some unknown information they had. Did any of them find it? Doubtful as there is enough information which one can only surmise, it remains where it was placed some 500 years ago.
 
One last thing, some of you have read or heard the similarities of the Signs, Symbols, Rights, Tokens and such of those of Mormonism, and Masonry and although I will not go into the details and I do not expect you to believe just because I said it by any means, but the reasons for the similarities, is that they have the same origin, some would assume Joseph borrowed these things from Masonry, No, Joseph merely restored, or brought clarity to meaning which was in part lost for near 2000 years, Joseph, Brigham and many Mormons of the early days had their reasons for being involved in Masonry. It is of ancient origin, we’ll leave it at that. Believe as you will, but there are consequences, or blessings as a result of your use of agency, used wisely or not.
 
So, the reason for the forgoing sermon is, in order to make sense out of some of the glyphs you may find out there, you might want to understand the motives, agenda, histories and much as you can about the people who left the glyphs. The same goes for studying the Native Glyphs, you have to understand who they really were, what they were dealing with, wars, contentions, migrations, intentional or forced…
 
The truth is out there just waiting for those who are determined enough to find it, and remembering, that if you seek with an agenda, you will no doubt find what you seek to support that agenda, seek to prove, and at the same time seek to disprove. It is my opinion that what you do with what you might find is to your own condemnation, or not.
 
I hope this will help in some way, in your search for truth.
 
Last Edited By: Digger II 03/18/12 07:54 AM. Edited 2 times.
 
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages