This 2025 editorial argues that peer reviewers and journal editors are “invisible scholars” whose labour underpins research integrity but is largely unrecognised by institutions. Citing
ASSAf’s 2024 statement and the
Hong Kong Principles, it urges universities and research councils to formally credit peer review and editorial work in workload models and promotion/tenure criteria. In the South African context - where teaching loads and resource constraints are high -
the piece highlights feedback from the August 2025 NSEF meeting and warns that failing to acknowledge this work threatens the sustainability of scholarly publishing.
Ina Smith (her/she)
SciELO SA Planning Manager | Scholarly Publishing Programme
Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf)

Senior Ambassador for Africa
Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
25A De Havilland Crescent, Persequor Park
Meiring Naudé Road, Lynnwood 0020, Pretoria, South Africa
PO Box 72135, Lynnwood Ridge 0040, Pretoria, South Africa
ASSAf Website:
https://www.assaf.org.za/
DOAJ Website:
https://doaj.org/

ASSAf Disclaimer: The views and opinions included in this email belong to their author and do not necessarily mirror the views and opinions of the organisation. Our employees are obliged not to make any defamatory statements, infringe, or authorize infringement
of any legal right. Therefore, the organisation will not accept any liability for such statements included in emails. In case of any damages or other liabilities arising, employees are fully responsible for the content of their emails. The processing of personal
information by ASSAf is done lawfully and not excessive to the purpose of processing in compliance with the POPI Act, any codes of conduct issued by the Information Regulator in terms of the POPI Act and / or relevant legislation providing appropriate security
safeguards for the processing of personal information of others.