Dear Readers:
But more
dangerous than that is the policy of fighting with each other among
Khmers under Hun Sen's leadership. Hun Sen is very smart in fighting
with his own Khmer race in order to live his life alone in this tiny
land of Khmer Empire. Pol Pot has been blamed about that policy. Now it
comes to Hun Sen who can mimic this policy correctly. Hun Sen should
utilize international laws and Paris Peace Accord to handle with
Thailand, not to closely associate with Thaksin and try to push Sam
Rainsy to ally with Abhisit without equating Sam Rainsy's self
consensus. Hun Sen is good in taming Sam Rainsy but not good in
conducting a proper policy to deal with Thailand and Vietnam regarding
our beloved border protection.
While I am jumping to
analyze the tension situation between Cambodia and Thailand especially
the appointment of Thaksin as Hun Sen's economic adviser, I am
expecting that my analysis would be one of the contributions for
Cambodian nation, and others will not label me as a "traitor" because
of my contradict opinion in appointing fugitive former PM Thaksin as
Hun Sen's economic adviser.
First,
Cambodian government is putting Cambodian people and her nation into a
burning fire. Cambodia has deserved full potential to play role of
international diplomacy with Thailand, but why Hun Sen chose "crashing
strategy" in this time?
Cambodia
can use international laws and Paris Peace Accord as means to deal with
Thailand and also with Vietnam. But why Cambodia government has never
paid attention and utilized this legitimate mean? Why Hun Sen appointed
Abhisit's rival as personal economic adviser?In the
meantime, Vietnam will gain both giving hand to help Cambodia to fight
with Thailand and sell more products to Cambodian people who are more
inclined to consumer than as producer behavior. Undeniably, Vietnamese
troops will be sent to help their former alliance Hun Sen and the CPP.
More gratitude and sympathy will be appeared among CPP's members and
some Cambodian people who are drunken of nationalism of Preah Vihear
scheme. More than this, Vietnam's secret intervention to support red
shirt to fight with yellow shirt will become more intensified and
effective as Vietnamese troops can station along border of
Cambodia-Thailand.
Second,
appointing Thaksin is like slapping incumbent PM Abhisit. The question
is that it is good or bad to publicly slap Abhisit like a comedian
without having proper plan to deal with the border issue? Or Hun Sen is
expecting to get that land back during appointing Thaksin or what? I
think it is too fast and very fool to assume that Thaksin, Chavalit and
Abhisit are fighting with each other because of border conflict with
Cambodia. If we use history as evidence, we have seen that both Thai
and Vietnamese have played double standard game to lure Khmers into
their trap. Finally their national interests are the most priority. We
have had huge evidence in hand that only Khmers who have fought each
others in centuries but ceded land to foreigners. Or we can say more
Khmers are fighting with each others, more death and land lost
occurred; but more Thais and Vietnamese are fighting with each other
more progressive and land gained occurred to their nation. With this
evidence, has Hun Sen realized this? And what Hun Sen's vision to gain
land for Cambodia?
Third,
ASEAN and UNs will support Cambodia if Cambodia utilize national laws
to deal with Thailand. Thailand has already expressed their concern and
disgrace if Cambodia plan to use that international laws especially
Paris Peace Agreement to deal with them of border issue. But
ASEAN, UNs and international communities dare not support Cambodia in
appointing Thaksin as economic adviser to confront with another rival
of Thailand. More than this, Abhisit government is more released and
happier than before now.
Fourth, appointing Thaksin as Hun Sen's adviser is absolutely appeared as "internal interference". Cambodia
should not try to deny this actual allegation. Cambodia has to do more
research to seek that when two rivals in their country are fighting
with each other, and we gives guns and supplies to one opponent
publicly, what act should we name ourselves? Retaliations have
happened among this public support to one rival to fight with another.
This is not a stage of boxing match or football court. It is lives and
blood of innocent people. We have huge evidence to show what happened
to such act. America tried/sentenced Saddam to death, may be not
because of Saddam's dictatorship and violence, it surely demonstrated
that it is because of America who grasped that Saddam supported
terrorists to bomb and eliminate America. This happened as well in
Cambodia. America supported Lon Nol to topple N. Sihanouk and neglected
the atrocity in Cambodia was because of N.Sihanouk who allowed north
Vietnamese troops to deliver their force and supplies in Cambodia land
to eliminate America. The current
situation that Hun Sen has developed his international politics with
Thailand might be very similar or the same. Finally Cambodian people
will be the victims, not Hun Sen and his colleagues.
Fifth,
the most important impression for political analysts and scholars
regarding Hun Sen's political move with Thailand is the suspect on "conflict of interest between Vietnam and Thailand" in using their hegemony over Cambodia.
There are many failures that Thailand has accepted in securing their
friendship with Cambodia. Frequently, more conflict Thailand has made
with Cambodia, more loss of interests Thailand has to give away to
Vietnam. For instance, the burning of Thai embassy in Phnom Penh is a
slap on the face, but in order to normalize its relations with
Cambodia, Thailand can accept millions of dollar as
compensation/reconstructing their embassy back. In
that time, Cambodian police authority have not been charged of
neglecting its duty. But Cambodian people money has to use to pay back
to Thailand. Cambodia gained some from that burning fever, but Cambodia
lost its face in the international stage of diplomacy and million of
dollars should be used to reduce Cambodian poverty. Interestingly,
Vietnam can increase its hegemony over Cambodia more than Thailand.
In
the meantime, Vietnam will gain both giving hand to help Cambodia to
fight with Thailand and sell more products to Cambodian people who are
more inclined to consumer than as producer behavior. Undeniably,
Vietnamese troops will be sent to help their former alliance Hun Sen
and the CPP. More gratitude and sympathy will be appeared among CPP's
members and some Cambodian people who are drunken of nationalism of
Preah Vihear scheme. More than this, Vietnam's secret intervention to
support red shirt to fight with yellow shirt will become more
intensified and effective as Vietnamese troops can station along border
of Cambodia-Thailand.
History has repeated again and again about
the fool policy of Cambodian leaders in fighting with Thailand, Vietnam
come to support and ceded some land as dowry to Vietnam.
But
more dangerous than that is the policy of fighting with each other
among Khmers under Hun Sen's leadership. Hun Sen is very smart in
fighting with his own Khmer race in order to live his life alone in
this tiny land of Khmer Empire. Pol Pot has been blamed about that
policy. Now it comes to Hun Sen who can mimic this policy correctly.
Hun Sen should utilize international laws and Paris Peace Accord to
handle with Thailand, not to closely associate with Thaksin and try to
push Sam Rainsy to ally with Abhisit without equating Sam Rainsy's self
consensus. Hun Sen is good in taming Sam Rainsy but not good in
conducting a proper policy to deal with Thailand and Vietnam regarding
our beloved border protection.
What a misfortune gene of Cambodian leaders?
In Solidarity
KY--
Cambodian Brighter Future depends on enduring conscience and tireless strivings of Cambodian Younger Generation!
http://cambodianbrightfuture.blogspot.com