Feedback if future Keycloak should use to JDBC_PING discovery
15 views
Skip to first unread message
Alexander Schwartz
unread,
May 2, 2024, 4:31:07 AMMay 2
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Keycloak User, Keycloak Dev
Dear Keycloak community,
The current cache configuration describes multiple JGroups discovery and transport configurations. While for example the Keycloak Operator hides that configuration complexity from users by configuring a reliable setup, there are regularly questions on how to configure discovery in other setups.
Common for all setups is that Keycloak stores its data in the database. So JDBC_PING seems to be a possible common denominator for all environments.
Red Hat GmbH, Registered seat: Werner von Siemens Ring 12, D-85630 Grasbrunn, Germany Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen/Munich, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Ryan Barnhart, Charles Cachera, Michael O'Neill, Amy Ross