procedural point...
3 views
Skip to first unread message
Randall Holmes
Jun 4, 2014, 1:54:29 PM6/4/14
to keu...@googlegroups.com, loglan list
Dear Keugru Members (cc loglanists),
from those who have not yet voted? It already has majority support, but I do like to hear from everyone.
I shall start turning my larger meta proposal "make the PEG parser the official definition, mod debugging and modifications proposed by others" into small bite sized chunks...you can already see
the outline of this in my agenda document.
And I encourage any suggestions from the rest of you...and for that matter, from the members of the loglanists list. Any proposals will be added to the agenda document; the Academy agenda is not *my* agenda, I have just been very busy, soi crano.
--
Sincerely, Randall Holmes
Any opinions expressed above are not the
official opinions of any person or institution.
Sincerely, Randall Holmes
Any opinions expressed above are not the
official opinions of any person or institution.
selpa'i
Jun 4, 2014, 2:00:27 PM6/4/14
to keu...@googlegroups.com
la Randal, ga cutse
But I am in favor of this new proposal 8 as well, since there doesn't
seem to be any chance we'll see name words as predicates any time soon. :)
--hue la Selpahi
> Dear Keugru Members (cc loglanists),
>
> Could I get votes on Proposal 8 (requiring CI before predunits in serial
> names)
> from those who have not yet voted? It already has majority support, but
> I do like to hear from everyone.
Proposal 8 seemed to be about unmarked vocatives, and it passed.
>
> Could I get votes on Proposal 8 (requiring CI before predunits in serial
> names)
> from those who have not yet voted? It already has majority support, but
> I do like to hear from everyone.
But I am in favor of this new proposal 8 as well, since there doesn't
seem to be any chance we'll see name words as predicates any time soon. :)
--hue la Selpahi
Randall Holmes
Jun 4, 2014, 2:36:11 PM6/4/14
to selpa'i, keu...@googlegroups.com
Oh dear, did I get the number wrong? At any rate I designated it clearly enough with additional information :-) Sia, hoi Selpahis!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Keugru" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to keugru+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
selpa'i
Jun 4, 2014, 2:58:02 PM6/4/14
to keu...@googlegroups.com
la Randal, ga cutse
proposal about bare vocatives Proposal 8 when it was really Proposal 9.
So "CI in serial names" *is* proposal 8.
8 or 9, it seems to be passing. :)
--hue la Selpahi
> Oh dear, did I get the number wrong? At any rate I designated it
> clearly enough with additional information :-) Sia, hoi Selpahis!
Actually, I think you got it wrong back then and first called the
> clearly enough with additional information :-) Sia, hoi Selpahis!
proposal about bare vocatives Proposal 8 when it was really Proposal 9.
So "CI in serial names" *is* proposal 8.
8 or 9, it seems to be passing. :)
--hue la Selpahi
Cyril Slobin
Jun 5, 2014, 7:37:00 PM6/5/14
to Randall Holmes, keu...@googlegroups.com, loglan list
Well, now I finally understood how Proposal 8 works, I vote for it.
Not like it changes a lot, it already has majority, but now it is
complete.
In Soviet Russia, beard cut you!
Cyril Slobin, http://slobin.ru
Not like it changes a lot, it already has majority, but now it is
complete.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Keugru" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to keugru+un...@googlegroups.com.
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Keugru" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
In Soviet Russia, beard cut you!
Cyril Slobin, http://slobin.ru
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages