Stream Lookup Improvements

32 views
Skip to first unread message

Brandon Jackson

unread,
Dec 23, 2015, 10:35:01 AM12/23/15
to kettle-developers
I am considering making an improvement to the stream lookup to support
* Between style lookups
* >
* <
* >=
* <=
* !=

Would this be a welcomed addition?
Would it be preferred as an enhancement to the existing step or as a new step that evolved from stream lookup?

If no feedback comes in, we will probably develop it as a separate step and publish to the marketplace.

Thanks ahead of time.  Merry Christmas to you all.

Best regards,

Brandon Jackson

Rutger Deterd Oude Weme

unread,
Dec 23, 2015, 11:13:32 AM12/23/15
to kettle-d...@googlegroups.com
I use the stream lookup step a lot, so any improvement is welcome!

Merry Christmas!

Regards,
Rutger


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "kettle-developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kettle-develop...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to kettle-d...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/kettle-developers.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Jens Bleuel

unread,
Dec 23, 2015, 11:16:49 AM12/23/15
to kettle-d...@googlegroups.com

Brandon,

 

this is welcomed, looks like it’s Christmas time J

 

Here are related cases: PDI-14024, PDI-591

My gut feeling is: include this into the existing step, have test cases for the old and new behavior to ensure it is fully backward compatible and we have no performance regressions.

 

We are actually working on guidelines for community contributions, but they are not public, yet. I’ll send you a note with more details via direct mail.

Thanks & Merry Christmas,

Jens

--

Dan

unread,
Dec 23, 2015, 11:20:12 AM12/23/15
to kettle-d...@googlegroups.com

+1 to updating existing step. Lots of steps doing the same thing is a backwards step imho

Sent from my phone

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages