Download Stuff For Linux
Milan Kemezy
A possible workaround is to use a second, already running and detached screen session to start the screen session to which you want to send the "stuff" command in attached mode, and then send that screen session a detach command and then the stuff command.
(Note: the doubled "screen" is not a typo!) You are still left with an unstuffable screen session (spawner) but if the resources it takes are important you can always just use "kill -TERM ..." or its ilk to terminate it (or have it automatically exit after a certain amount of time by starting it with something like
Stuff the string string in the input buffer of the current window. This is like the paste command, but with much less overhead. You cannot paste large buffers with the stuff command. It is most useful for key bindings.
I don't understand why people always talk about "learning how to use linux", like there it's some kind of school subject. When the only thing you need to do is look online to find a solution like you would do in every other situation/os. Maybe the amount of problems and troubles you are going to face will be higher but, to me, the principle is the same.
It seems in the near future Swift might be as convenient as C++ in that regard (as long as you only use the standard library and no OS specific stuff you'll probably be fine), but I was hoping Swift could do better in this area since it seems most of the building blocks necessary are already there?
I obviously could wait for CI to tell me, but it doesn't seem to be super convenient. I would really like to be in a place where if my stuff compiles and works on macOS there's a very high chance it will also compile and work on Linux.
If you use platform specific features you can just use docker to build and run swift on linux locally on your mac. After you have downloaded and installed docker you can just run the following command:
Cross Compilation from macOS to Linux will be possible with this pitch: Pitch: Cross-Compilation Destination Bundles. You will then no longer need docker to build your code for linux. If you want to run it you will still need a Linux VM after all.
Whatever compiler errors you're getting when cross-compiling are unrelated to which compiler driver is used, as both mac/linux toolchains should be using the new driver written in Swift. --skip-early-swift-driver is only used when building the linux toolchain because the linux build doesn't require a prebuilt Swift toolchain, so it uses the legacy C++ Driver to build everything up till the new driver written in Swift, then builds, installs, and uses that new Swift driver.
I'm trying to learn as much about linux as I possibly can and I'm looking for some fun stuff to do, setting up different servers basically. Most likely I'll wind up writing some how to's on the stuff.
But this or a similar solution might be what the OP wanted in the form of physically disabling hdds.
You work on linux and want to switch to Win? Instead of reboot, I would give shutdown, wait for the pc to turn off, then press the buttons from hdd and finally power on and boot to Win. Simple and uncomplicated and the drive will not fall victim to anything because it sleeps without power.
Suppose I use LibreElec as a starting point (because watching stuff on TV is the primary use of my Pi) but I want to do a little development, run OpenVPN, an FTP server etc. Will I run into problems doing this, or can I SSH to the Pi and apt-get install whatever I want like on a regular Debian? If it's ok to do so, should I avoid upgrading any core OS components (ie avoid dist-upgrades etc)?
You can run any Linux binary you want in the shell of course, but there's no package manager and no software repositories with software built for LE. As mentioned, the root filesystem is read-only so you'll need to run it from /storage. If the software depends on stuff being in /usr or /etc then you're out of luck.
Why installing or uninstalling a new application in linux is so complex? why there is no installer like windows installer which would help users without prior knowledge about linux command line (like me) to install new programs..?
I host a lot of websites and our system makes it easy to duplicate items in these sites which is handy, but leads to lots of duplicated (and potentially quite large) files. I was wondering if these is any mechanism in linux (specifically Ubuntu) where the filesystem will only store the file once but link to it from all its locations.
Issue 1 - hidden linux directories
on my owncloud server, I've ended up with several hidden directories. Their names all start with . (the dot)
These directories show up in the sync client under files to sync (I can check or uncheck them)
In the web interface, they don't show up.
Oh, don't ask how I ended up with this stuff in there. I've ran OC since the 5 days...Best I remember, I followed some doc to copy the files into the data directory and ran a rescan. But that has been a few years ago so I'm not sure...
The Linux kernel is a widely ported operating system kernel, available for devices ranging from mobile phones to supercomputers; it runs on a highly diverse range of computer architectures, including ARM-based Android smartphones and the IBM Z mainframes. Specialized distributions and kernel forks exist for less mainstream architectures; for example, the ELKS kernel fork can run on Intel 8086 or Intel 80286 16-bit microprocessors, while the µClinux kernel fork may run on systems without a memory management unit. The kernel also runs on architectures that were only ever intended to use a proprietary manufacturer-created operating system, such as Macintosh computers[102][103] (with PowerPC, Intel, and Apple silicon processors), PDAs, video game consoles, portable music players, and mobile phones.
Actually right now I'm doing this all with test drives just to prove out the process that I "can" load it up and rescue the data this way before I try to recover from my real data disks. But I have little to no linux experience so I was really hoping someone here would have enough experience to let me know what commands to use and how to use them.
Are there any maintained exclusion lists to solve these? BTW this should be in restic i think, as these are quite common, to exclude all things that should not be backed up both from linux, and windows.
1). Backup /home/user to a remote drive, including hidden directories/files.
2). Install an upgraded OS (Debian Buster) from scratch.
3). Try to figure out how to get all the user stuff back for Brave Browser from the backup.
Usually you have to setup your sound system first. Linux Mint comes with Alsa/ Pulseaudio. If you use just one sound card, USB-Audio or MIDI input, this is enough. If you want to combine more external devices look for Jack or Pipewire.
I am happy with the DAW Reaper on Linux Mint. Its around 70 bucks, but you can try for free.
If you like Linux you might try Reaper, because no other tool can be so adapted to your workflow. For instruments and effect plugins:
-linuxaudio
DAW: Qtractor or Reaper. Qtractor because it's Linux native, can be very easily installed on any Linux system and has a user interface in which you can choose to show very little distracting stuff. Reaper because it has native versions for Linux, Apple and Windows. With Reaper you can share your projects with anybody on any platform.
Yes I think I would try to do so. (I must admit that I have no experience with scratch music - am an old-fashioned bassman )... It's comfortable that all that Ardour and LibraZiK stuff is free: You can check it out without taking any risk .
Well, that time may come closer and closer (my wishful thinking). Currently (by quick glance), the biggest issue is WPF, while it's in .net core 7.0 it isn't compatible with linux. While the WCF got already replaced with gRPC, the UI remains a big issue. While Avalonia UI could help here, it's way lot more work. and Avalonia XPF could help (according to the site), it's not opensource.
From my perspective, the difference here is that we have a software developer that wants to be able to get in and tinker with stuff via open source clone/fork etc, and one whose objective is to have happy users that don't need to tinker and who probably don't even care about programming. There's room for all of us here, and we don't need to get into religious differences.
It requires you to download the installer and place it in the LogosBible10 folder... can do app image or not. This is only tested by me so far. You understand this is early days. It only changes stuff in /LogosBible10 and only if that folder doesn't exist so should be safe.
I'm in the phase of choosing a new pc for work stuffs for my PhD, I'm working basically on Amplicon, metagenomics, and various things related to microbial ecology stuffs. I'm undecided among a macOS system (with M1 pro or M2 pro) or a Dell with similiar computational power (we talk about around 16/32 GB of memory and general powerful characteristics). I need to specify to the department in my institute which one I could prefer. I will use it for analysis in python/bash/R and using programs like FastQc, Cutadapt, Trimmomatic, Kraken2, Barrnap, Porechop and similar. In addition to this we have powerful HPC server on which usually we perform more important computational work. I want to make me free from server work for base/medium weight work. My doubt is based on compatibility of M1/M2 processor (in particular the pro version) with software and tools. What you suggest?
35fe9a5643