I had similar issues but I think I've solved mine.
In general, keepnote seems to use a lot of resouces both memory and disk access. I found it competing with my daily backup.
Changing the autosave time to 60 seconds helped. I also lowered the priority of my backup task. I no longer keep 6 notebooks open and I've reduced the size of each notebook.
These may have nothing to do with your problem.
Are you really running keepnote under wine? Everything I run under wine seems slow.
Hi,
Keepnote is a great application. It is what I was looking for to organize my graduate student life. The most similar free app is ZIM desktop, but I go for Keepnote because of cleanness, folder structure, etc.
But I just can't sustain my nerves every time the cursor lags 1/2 seconds behind the action (writing or navigating), etc.
Can anyone give me some hints on why keepnote insists being slow? I have looked online, and checked previous posts, and I couldn't find a systematic solution or analysis of the problem.
I run Linux Mint (12.04).
Thanks
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "keepnote" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/keepnote/-/xA1Vspc-ou4J.
To post to this group, send email to keep...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to keepnote+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/keepnote?hl=en.
I also recently started using Keepnote, first the stable and now the beta on 12.04.
I've been having the same weird lags... it's a brief moment where everything pauses and then catches up. It's often enough to be noticeable.
I've tried launching keepnote --show-errors from a terminal... no output to speak of. I found some posts in an old email listing that mentioned a spelling database might be the culprit. I removed and switched dictionaries, even though I would figure that disabling spell check would be enough...
As a last resort... I upgraded to the beta but no love. On the plus side, the beta seems very stable... assuming the above problems are on my system of course. ;)
Regards...
Daniel
On Sunday, July 29, 2012 07:41:32 PM David Vavra wrote: