| This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104261/ |
|
Review request for KDE Runtime.
By makis marimpis.
Description
Diffs
|
| This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104261/ |
| service/ActivityManager.cpp (Diff revision 1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
bool ActivityManagerPrivate::setCurrentActivity(const QString & id) |
|||
| 277 | |
||
remove trailing whitespace.
You should also save the desktop id in disk so that on next reboot kamd sets the currect desktop id. Just do
mainConfig().writeEntry("currentDesktop", desktopId);
here and read the value in ActivityManager::ActivityManager().
| service/ActivityManager.cpp (Diff revision 1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
bool ActivityManagerPrivate::setCurrentActivity(const QString & id) |
|||
| 289 | |
||
remove trailing whitespace.
| service/ActivityManager.cpp (Diff revision 1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
bool ActivityManagerPrivate::setCurrentActivity(const QString & id) |
|||
| 292 | |
||
remove trailing whitespace.
| service/ActivityManager.cpp (Diff revision 1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
bool ActivityManagerPrivate::setCurrentActivity(const QString & id) |
|||
| 296 | |
||
remove trailing whitespace.
- Lamarque Vieira
On March 13th, 2012, 6:53 p.m., makis marimpis wrote:
|
Review request for KDE Runtime.
By makis marimpis.
|
Updated March 13, 2012, 6:53 p.m. |
| This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104261/ |
|
Review request for KDE Runtime.
By makis marimpis.
|
Updated March 14, 2012, 7:28 p.m. Changes
|
Description
|
Diffs (updated) |
| This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104261/ |
|
Review request for KDE Runtime.
By makis marimpis.
|
Updated March 15, 2012, 6:13 p.m. |
Description
Diffs |
| This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104261/ |
Could you please add group "Plasma" to reviewers?
- Christoph
| This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104261/ |
|
Review request for KDE Runtime and Plasma.
By makis marimpis.
Updated March 16, 2012, 7:40 a.m. Changes
|
| This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104261/ |
bool ActivityManagerPrivate::setCurrentActivity(const QString & id) |
| 303 | if (desktopId <= KWindowSystem::numberOfDesktops()) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| 304 | KWindowSystem::setCurrentDesktop(desktopId); |
should also check for >= 0. also, this statement needs {}s, we use them even for single line conditionals :)
- Aaron J.
On March 16th, 2012, 7:40 a.m., makis marimpis wrote:
|
Review request for KDE Runtime and Plasma.
By makis marimpis.
Updated March 16, 2012, 7:40 a.m. |
Description |
| This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104261/ |
|
Review request for KDE Runtime and Plasma.
By makis marimpis.
|
Updated March 16, 2012, 11:55 a.m. Changes
|
Description
|
Diffs (updated) |
| This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104261/ |
| service/ActivityManager.cpp (Diff revision 3) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
ActivityManagerPrivate::ActivityManagerPrivate(ActivityManager * parent, |
|||
| 116 | foreach (const QString & activity, activitiesDesktopsConfig().keyList()) { |
||
Why do you want to keep these in memory?
- Ivan
On March 16th, 2012, 11:55 a.m., makis marimpis wrote:
|
Review request for KDE Runtime and Plasma.
By makis marimpis.
Updated March 16, 2012, 11:55 a.m. |
Description |
Diffs |
| This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104261/ |
Hm, i did that in order to restore the desktop ids from a previous run of kamd (let's say, in case of log out).
- makis
| This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104261/ |
On March 16th, 2012, 1 p.m., makis marimpis wrote:
Hm, i did that in order to restore the desktop ids from a previous run of kamd (let's say, in case of log out).
You misunderstood, I don't mind saving it in the config file, I don't understand the need to keep all those in memory. For example, Bob has 20 activities, usually uses only 3 of them. Why would you want to keep the rest of the VD IDs in memory? Just read the VD ID when necessary. As you can see, we are not keeping anything that is saved to a config file in memory apart from the list of activities. The names, icons etc. are read from the config when needed.
| This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104261/ |
On March 16th, 2012, 1 p.m., makis marimpis wrote:
Hm, i did that in order to restore the desktop ids from a previous run of kamd (let's say, in case of log out).
On March 17th, 2012, 11:52 a.m., Ivan Čukić wrote:
You misunderstood, I don't mind saving it in the config file, I don't understand the need to keep all those in memory. For example, Bob has 20 activities, usually uses only 3 of them. Why would you want to keep the rest of the VD IDs in memory? Just read the VD ID when necessary. As you can see, we are not keeping anything that is saved to a config file in memory apart from the list of activities. The names, icons etc. are read from the config when needed.
Now i see your point. I have implemented the same patch using only KConfigGroup but because of the "scheduleConfigSync" there is a case where the sync cannot keep up with the change of the activities - leading to a weird behavior (the changes are not yet made volatile). That could be solved by calling "configSync" explicitly but that could affect the performace? (no idea). To sum up: i think it is faster and less error-prone to store in memory and sync whenever sync is scheduled to, than to read/write whenever an activity is changed.
- makis
| This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104261/ |
On March 16th, 2012, 1 p.m., makis marimpis wrote:
Hm, i did that in order to restore the desktop ids from a previous run of kamd (let's say, in case of log out).
On March 17th, 2012, 11:52 a.m., Ivan Čukić wrote:
You misunderstood, I don't mind saving it in the config file, I don't understand the need to keep all those in memory. For example, Bob has 20 activities, usually uses only 3 of them. Why would you want to keep the rest of the VD IDs in memory? Just read the VD ID when necessary. As you can see, we are not keeping anything that is saved to a config file in memory apart from the list of activities. The names, icons etc. are read from the config when needed.
On March 17th, 2012, 4:18 p.m., makis marimpis wrote:
Now i see your point. I have implemented the same patch using only KConfigGroup but because of the "scheduleConfigSync" there is a case where the sync cannot keep up with the change of the activities - leading to a weird behavior (the changes are not yet made volatile). That could be solved by calling "configSync" explicitly but that could affect the performace? (no idea). To sum up: i think it is faster and less error-prone to store in memory and sync whenever sync is scheduled to, than to read/write whenever an activity is changed.
Not knowing the code around this, I would just like to point out that KConfig/KConfigGroup is already a "cache in memory". So, reading/writing should be fast. KConfig::sync is the slow bit (reading from disk if it was changed from the outside, then writing to disk). Can't comment on "less error-prone" though, I don't know the activity code -- but indeed there's the general risk of a partial config read followed by a "save all", which loses everything that hadn't been read yet. Happened in old kmail far too many times.
- David
| This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104261/ |
|
Review request for KDE Runtime and Plasma.
By makis marimpis.
|
Updated March 18, 2012, 9:22 a.m. Changes
|
Description
Diffs (updated) |
|
| This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104261/ |
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Ivan
On March 18th, 2012, 9:22 a.m., makis marimpis wrote:
|
Review request for KDE Runtime and Plasma.
By makis marimpis.
Updated March 18, 2012, 9:22 a.m. |
Description |
Diffs |
| This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104261/ |
On March 21st, 2012, 6:29 p.m., Ivan Čukić wrote:
Ship It!
please forgive my ignorance, but should i close it as submitted or wait? :-)
- makis