Re: [LPNM-discuss] Upcoming ballots

0 views
Skip to first unread message

KCUF Media [ Mike Blessing ]

unread,
Oct 20, 2008, 11:06:33 PM10/20/08
to lpnm-d...@yahoogroups.com
Bruce Bush wrote:
>> He is sheriff.....running for Congress......classic race between far
>> right ass and far left ass...neither likeable in any way!
>>
>> Tim
>
> Oh, I don't know about that... Martin's awfully cute!

He's also married (wife's name is Julie), but it might be
an open relationship. Go for it, Bruce.

I'm just wondering what his subjectively-defined "cuteness"
has to do with his fitness to serve in the House of
Representatives. Both he and Doofus Darren are rather
selective in their support for the Constitutionally-protected
rights that they'll swear to support and defend, and rather
lackadaisical even for those, considering their past actions
and positions they've advocated during this campaign.

-- Mike Blessing

Mike Blessing

unread,
Oct 22, 2008, 5:11:20 PM10/22/08
to lpnm-d...@yahoogroups.com
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 7:35 PM, Rob Taylor <obet...@msn.com> wrote:
Maybe voting on physical attraction would produce a better looking NAZI...

I've heard it said on more than one occasion that Heinrich is rather Aryan-looking . . .

And there is my tendency to refer to fascist Democrats with titles similar to those from
the Third Reich, just as I refer to socialist Republicans with titles similar to those
from the Soviet Union.

Finally, for the record, I'd like to reiterate that "Nazi" is a contraction of the German
words for "National Socialist" -- the long name of the "Nazi Party" was the "National
Socialist German Workers' Party" -- Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei

-- from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_Party
______________________________________________________________________
Mike Blessing -- http://xanga.com/mikewb1971
Phone -- 505-918-6567 / Yahoo IM -- mikewb1971

Who owns you? Who runs your life? Who wipes your ass?
Who should -- you or someone else?

KCUF Media, UnIncorporated
Commentary and Opinion for the Undamaged Mind
http://xanga.com/kcufmedia
______________________________________________________________________
 

 ----- Original Message -----
 From: Bruce Bush<mailto:bruc...@msn.com>
 To: lpnm-d...@yahoogroups.com<mailto:lpnm-d...@yahoogroups.com>
 Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 6:27 PM
 Subject: RE: [LPNM-discuss] Upcoming ballots

Well, Mike, I hoped it would be obviously that my little commentary was a little joke (a self-depricating one, for those who know me). But if I didn't know anything about the two 1st District federal House candidates, I know I'd be a lot more likely to vote for the one that doesn't exude pig-ishness out of every pore. Having rubbed elbows with Darren White for, now, 12 years, and knowing his record I think he's one of the best examples of "What you wear in your heart, you wear in your face."

 Thanks for completing the joke, Rob.

 Yours,
 Bruce
 PS - The serious aspect of this question is one that Joe Knight used to talk about frequently: most people vote their emotions, not their intellect.
 ________________________________
 > To: lpnm-d...@yahoogroups.com<mailto:lpnm-discuss%40yahoogroups.com>
 > From: obet...@msn.com<mailto:obetewic%40msn.com>
 > Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:50:40 -0700
 > Subject: Re: [LPNM-discuss] Upcoming ballots
 >
 >
 > Because Mike if you're going to get screwed by a politician it is better that it be by an attractive person than an ugly one.
 >
 > WAKA WAKA WAKA

KCUF Media [ Mike Blessing ]

unread,
Oct 23, 2008, 11:17:52 PM10/23/08
to lpnm-d...@yahoogroups.com
Bruce Bush wrote:
> I know, Bob, Mike, Tim, et al (especially Bill K.), that this may be a
> pointless distinction to be making since the ultimate end of both/either
> socialist or fascist systems is likely to be the same: slavery for the
> bulk of the populace. But, historically, Il Duce made the distinction
> by defining fascism as corporatism (indicated by hostility to labor unions,
> special deals for the big businesses. And, in recent history, the European
> socialisms have not degenerated into full-blown fascism, nor was their
> intent to inflict a cultural conformity at the end of a gun barrel and/or
> shut down dissent. Please see Naomi Wolfe's 10 Steps to Fascism at...
>
> http://survivalacres.com/wordpress/?p=943

As for the Eurosocialists not descending into full-blown fascism, well .
. . . give them time.

Took a look at the Wolfe article -- will she be making similar comments
when Obama picks up the ball from George XLIII and continues down the
field? Or will she make excuses for Barack XIV when He moves to strangle
freedom, as Republicans did for Comrade George?

I'm betting on the latter.

> ... to see why I fear the right-wingers more than the left... at this time,
> in our nation. They all apply to W's reign of terror and are why I've been
> saying Neo-Conservative = Neo-Nazi.
>
> And I've also been saying, "social conservatism (as a political movement)
> = National Socialism", meaning Republican policies to institutionalize
> intolerance by inflicting one's cultural prejudices on the entire society
> with the force of law are just despicable Nazi horseshit! It's a good
> description of recent Rethuglican political behavior and the reason I try
> to be as nasty as possible in talking about the leaders of that debased party.

Like the Democreeps haven't been equally prejudicial towards gun owners,
property owners and small business owners?

Give me a break.

> Now, I know some (most?) of you on this discussion list think the economic
> "spread the wealth" policies of the Dem-socialists are comparable to the
> Rep-fascists' oppression of person's liberties and the other steps to
> fascism Ms. Wolfe lays out... but I think you're wrong.

Last time I checked, quite a bit of the GOP agenda against personal
liberty (USA-PATRIOT Act of 2001, for example) had significant Democrat
support.

-- Mike Blessing

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages