He's also married (wife's name is Julie), but it might be
an open relationship. Go for it, Bruce.
I'm just wondering what his subjectively-defined "cuteness"
has to do with his fitness to serve in the House of
Representatives. Both he and Doofus Darren are rather
selective in their support for the Constitutionally-protected
rights that they'll swear to support and defend, and rather
lackadaisical even for those, considering their past actions
and positions they've advocated during this campaign.
-- Mike Blessing
Maybe voting on physical attraction would produce a better looking NAZI...
----- Original Message -----> To: lpnm-d...@yahoogroups.com<mailto:lpnm-discuss%40yahoogroups.com>
From: Bruce Bush<mailto:bruc...@msn.com>
To: lpnm-d...@yahoogroups.com<mailto:lpnm-d...@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 6:27 PM
Subject: RE: [LPNM-discuss] Upcoming ballots
Well, Mike, I hoped it would be obviously that my little commentary was a little joke (a self-depricating one, for those who know me). But if I didn't know anything about the two 1st District federal House candidates, I know I'd be a lot more likely to vote for the one that doesn't exude pig-ishness out of every pore. Having rubbed elbows with Darren White for, now, 12 years, and knowing his record I think he's one of the best examples of "What you wear in your heart, you wear in your face."
Thanks for completing the joke, Rob.
Yours,
Bruce
PS - The serious aspect of this question is one that Joe Knight used to talk about frequently: most people vote their emotions, not their intellect.
________________________________
> From: obet...@msn.com<mailto:obetewic%40msn.com>
> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:50:40 -0700
> Subject: Re: [LPNM-discuss] Upcoming ballots
>
>
> Because Mike if you're going to get screwed by a politician it is better that it be by an attractive person than an ugly one.
>
> WAKA WAKA WAKA
As for the Eurosocialists not descending into full-blown fascism, well .
. . . give them time.
Took a look at the Wolfe article -- will she be making similar comments
when Obama picks up the ball from George XLIII and continues down the
field? Or will she make excuses for Barack XIV when He moves to strangle
freedom, as Republicans did for Comrade George?
I'm betting on the latter.
> ... to see why I fear the right-wingers more than the left... at this time,
> in our nation. They all apply to W's reign of terror and are why I've been
> saying Neo-Conservative = Neo-Nazi.
>
> And I've also been saying, "social conservatism (as a political movement)
> = National Socialism", meaning Republican policies to institutionalize
> intolerance by inflicting one's cultural prejudices on the entire society
> with the force of law are just despicable Nazi horseshit! It's a good
> description of recent Rethuglican political behavior and the reason I try
> to be as nasty as possible in talking about the leaders of that debased party.
Like the Democreeps haven't been equally prejudicial towards gun owners,
property owners and small business owners?
Give me a break.
> Now, I know some (most?) of you on this discussion list think the economic
> "spread the wealth" policies of the Dem-socialists are comparable to the
> Rep-fascists' oppression of person's liberties and the other steps to
> fascism Ms. Wolfe lays out... but I think you're wrong.
Last time I checked, quite a bit of the GOP agenda against personal
liberty (USA-PATRIOT Act of 2001, for example) had significant Democrat
support.
-- Mike Blessing