I have some data that is constrained below a 1:1 line. I would to demonstrate this on a plot by lightly shading the area ABOVE the line, to draw the attention of the viewer to the area beneath the line.
I did not use the method that @Andrie referenced here since I ran into issues with ggplot's tendency to automatically extend the plot extents when you add points near the edges. Instead, this builds the polygon points manually using Inf and -Inf as needed. A few notes:
The points have to be in the 'correct' order in the data frame, since ggplot plots the polygon in the order that the points appear. So it's not enough to get the vertices of the polygon, they must be ordered (either clockwise or counterclockwise) as well.
This solution assumes that the line you are plotting does not itself cause ggplot to extend the plot range. You'll see in my example that I pick a line to draw by randomly choosing two points in the data and drawing the line through them. If you try to draw a line too far away from the rest of you points, ggplot will automatically alter the plot ranges, and it becomes hard to predict what they will be.
It expects the x and y ranges of your data (as in range()), the slope and intercept of the line you are going to plot, and whether you want to shade above or below the line. Here's the code I used to generate the following four examples:
Is there a command to copy the above line in terminal? This is a shell agnostic question (e.g. bash, zsh, etc.) basically I am using pwd and want to copy the output without having to type the long directory within my next command.
Bash doesn't automatically store the stdout or stderr of the previous command. It mainly doesn't do this because of performance reasons. It could potentially take up a lot of RAM if the stdout output was very large, as is sometimes the case.
This is also why terminal emulators, everything from the built-in Linux VT up to gnome-terminal, impose a reasonably small limit on the amount of scrollback buffers (number of lines you can scroll up) before it "wraps".
Help please. I selected some EXCEL function which causes a blank workbook to open and show a line above Line 1. I think the line is called Formula Builder. I want to remove it and just have the workbook open with Line 1 as the first line. What drop down function do I use to change this. (Even more strange, when I save the workbook and then reopen it, the numbers down the left column are upside down. Once I scroll up and down they appear normal again!) Thank you. Joe Ranney
But anyway I want to have ruled lines on a section of the artboard and then I want to have text above those lines similar to what you would have on like a chart or a table. like automatic underlining similar to what you can do with InDesign.
3) With only the Fill selected in the Appearance panel apply three Effects on top of one another, and with the Reference Point set to bottom centre, use Preview to see what you are doing while doing it:
So i would like somthing in exsampel 3C but this is what i endded up with. and im not sure what the referince point is. i gusseing its the grid of Squares bottom left in the same row with copies in right above preview. is that right?
In 3A) Convert to Shape > Rectangle, Relative with Extra Width and Height set to 0, you ought to get a rectangle corresponding to the Bounding Box like the one behind the BL (shown in grey to make the BL stand out instead of blending in, so after that there ought to be only the original instance of text.
"Above-the-line" refers to the list of individuals who guide and influence the creative direction, process, and voice of a given narrative in a film and related expenditures. These roles include but are not limited to the screenwriter, producer, director, and principal cast.[1][2][3]
Often, the term is used for matters related to the film's production budget. Above-the-line expenditures reflect the expected line item compensation for an official above-the-line member's role in a given film project. These expenditures are usually set, negotiated, spent and/or promised before principal photography begins. They include rights to secure the material on which the screenplay is based, production rights to the screenplay, compensation for the screenwriter, producer, director, principal actors and other cost-related line items such as assistants for the producers, director or actors.
I would like the following for "Cumulative Value". My current formula is rangesum(above(sum(Value), 0,3)), and it works in table form when you sort by Tier, and in the line chart when the primary dimension is Tier and the secondary is Month.
Obviously it sums the values grouping by month rather than tier. Any solutions? I'd like the cumulative values from the first table visualized in a line chart with Month on the x-axis and Tier as the dimension. Thanks.
Hi,
Our users love to reply to tickets via email and that's okay. The problem is that when they reply I can see the previous answer too, even if this is under the -- reply -- line tag. The setting "Strip Quoted Reply" is on. I'm also able to see the tag if I look at the html source of a mail generated from osTicket.
Any idea on what's going wrong here?
Please help us to help you by reading and following the posting guidelines located in this thread: Please read before requesting assistance. The more information you give us the better we will be able to assist you. Thank you.
I did some more testing and it looks like that it doesn't work if I have a short line tag. I used -- reply -- and it did not work. When I changed it to something longer like -- type your answer above -- it worked. For me good enough like this.
When is not enough place for text on lines this quit common way to add description of line (meaning). This text is usually smaller than main text. For it I select \footnotesize. I broke it manually, I think that on this way you can easily accommodate his appearances to your taste or to disposable space.
Here is a way it can be done with MetaPost and the rboxes package (complement of the boxes packages for round-corners boxes), for whom it may interest: putting the text label in a \parbox of specified width (here 2.5 cm), separating the two boxes by a shade more than this width (here 2.8 cm), and locating the label at the middle of the arrow joining both boxes. Note that I have chosen to center the text in the label, since it looks better this way.
The code has been included in a LuaLaTeX program for typesetting convenience. Also, it has allowed the use of the em and en TeX units, thanks luamplib's \mpdim command. See also the gmp package for another, not LuaLaTeX-specific but less direct way of inserting MetaPost code into a LaTeX program.
People working above the line of representation continuously build and refresh their models of what lies below the line. That activity is critical to the resilience of Internet-facing systems and the principal source of adaptive capacity.
The intimate, ongoing relationship between tech software/hardware components and the people who make, modify, and repair them is at once remarkable and frustrating. The exceptional reach and capacity of Internet-based enterprises results from indissolubly linking humans and machines into a continuously changing, nondeterministic, fully distributed system.
1. The people who intervene in failure are often the same people who built the stuff in the first place. The diagnosticians and repairers are frequently the same people who designed, wrote, debugged, and installed the very software and hardware that are now failing. They participated in the intricacies, dependencies, and assumptions that produced and arranged these artifacts. Even when they did not, they often have worked and interacted with others and have learned along the way who contributed and who is expert in those areas. This sets the community apart from other operator communities (e.g., pilots, nurses).
3. The continuing failures constantly redirect attention to the places where their understandings are incomplete or inaccurate. There is an ongoing stream of anomalies that demand attention. The resulting engagement produces insight into the fragility, limitations, and perversities that matter at the moment. Anomalies are pointers to those areas where problems manifest, what Beth Long calls "the explody bits." These are also areas where further exploration is likely to be rewarding. This is valuable information, especially because continuous change moves the locus of failure. This is also why longitudinal collections of incidents so rarely prove useful: Past performance is no guarantee of future returns.
4. There is a distinct community of practice with its own ethos. The people who do this work form what Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger call a community of practice.3 This is a tangled network characterized by communications and processes that simultaneously share knowledge, distribute responsibility, and provoke actions. The network has some remarkable features. New people are joining all the time, and their induction into the community leads its members to revisit old ground. Because so much learning takes place on the job and in real rather than simulated settings, it has qualities of a guild. Because the people involved change jobs frequently, the guild extends over time and across corporate boundaries. This produces diffusion of expertise across the industry and simultaneously creates a relationship mesh that bridges corporate boundaries.
The barriers to entry into this network are low. There is not yet a formal process of training nor certification of authority that characterizes similar domains (e.g., medicine). This has promoted rapid growth of the community while also creating uncertainty that manifests in hiring practices (e.g., code-writing exercises).
This community of practice appears to have a distinct ethos that puts great emphasis on keeping the system working and defending it against failures, damage, or disruption. The community values both technical expertise and the capacity to function under stress; membership in the community depends on having successfully weathered difficult and demanding situations. Similarly, the collective nature of work during threatening events encourages both cooperation and support. As Lave and Wenger observed for other communities of practice, mastery here is gained via "legitimate peripheral participation."
c80f0f1006