Hi Andrew,
Thanks.
On my machine, the userspace-visible effect was that unmounting a 9p
filesystem returned successfully, but the kernel reported that the 9p
fcall slab cache still had objects during cache destruction.
The sequence was:
1. mount a virtio-9p filesystem;
2. read files from it on CPU1;
3. write to the 9p fcall slab cache's sysfs shrink file while racing
with CPU1 offlining;
4. unmount the filesystem.
The shrink step is what can leave objects on the offline CPU's
shrink_qlist; the later umount exposes the problem through
kmem_cache_destroy().
The mount and umount commands both returned 0. Unmounting the filesystem
then reports this dmesg excerpt:
[ 2994.380134][ T111] BUG 9p-fcall-cache-1 (Tainted: G B ): Objects remaining on __kmem_cache_shutdown()
[ 2994.381140][ T111] Object 0xff11000004361118 @offset=4376
[ 2994.381607][ T111] Allocated in p9_fcall_init+0x201/0x400 age=19564 cpu=1 pid=104
[ 2994.382591][ T111] p9_fcall_init+0x201/0x400
[ 2994.382810][ T111] p9_tag_alloc+0x12f/0x700
[ 2994.382982][ T111] p9_client_prepare_req+0x102/0x3e0
[ 2994.383165][ T111] p9_client_rpc+0x1ab/0xa50
[ 2994.383334][ T111] p9_client_getattr_dotl+0xb0/0x1a0
[ 2994.383515][ T111] v9fs_vfs_getattr_dotl+0x115/0x360
[ 2994.383719][ T111] vfs_getattr_nosec+0x22c/0x3a0
[ 2994.383910][ T111] vfs_statx+0xd7/0x170
[ 2994.384062][ T111] vfs_fstatat+0x45/0x80
[ 2994.384215][ T111] __do_sys_newfstatat+0x84/0xe0
[ 2994.384386][ T111] do_syscall_64+0x115/0x6a0
[ 2994.384566][ T111] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
[ 2994.399720][ T111] WARNING: mm/slub.c:1244 at __kmem_cache_shutdown+0x363/0x500, CPU#0: busybox/111
[ 2994.405655][ T111] Call Trace:
[ 2994.406325][ T111] kmem_cache_destroy+0x73/0x1b0
[ 2994.406630][ T111] p9_client_destroy+0x271/0x3c0
[ 2994.407210][ T111] v9fs_session_close+0x3c/0x260
[ 2994.407409][ T111] v9fs_kill_super+0x48/0x90
[ 2994.407584][ T111] deactivate_locked_super+0xa3/0x160
[ 2994.407778][ T111] cleanup_mnt+0x1dd/0x3e0
So the userspace-visible effect is not that umount fails. It is that a
successful userspace-triggered teardown leaves the 9p fcall slab cache
with objects still present, produces the slab shutdown warning above, and
prevents the cache from being destroyed cleanly.
> > Fixes: 07d067e4f2ce ("kasan: fix sleeping function called from invalid context on RT kernel")
> > Cc:
sta...@vger.kernel.org
>
> Especially when proposing a backport. At present we've provided our
> -stable recipients no reason to accept the patch.
>
> Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst says "it must fix a real
> bug that bothers people".
>
Yes, I agree. I did not include the real bug dmesg in the original
changelog, which made the stable rationale unclear.
The 9p case above shows that this is a real bug: a userspace-triggered
teardown path can leave objects in the 9p fcall cache and report the slab
shutdown warning after umount.
Should I keep Cc: stable in PATCH v2 with this dmesg and
userspace-visible effect added to the changelog?
>
> > --- a/mm/kasan/quarantine.c
> > +++ b/mm/kasan/quarantine.c
> > @@ -355,7 +355,12 @@ void kasan_quarantine_remove_cache(struct kmem_cache *cache)
> > */
> > on_each_cpu(per_cpu_remove_cache, cache, 1);
> >
> > - for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> > + /*
> > + * A CPU can go offline after on_each_cpu() returns, leaving cache
> > + * objects on that CPU's shrink list. Scan all possible CPUs to
> > + * drain those lists.
> > + */
> > + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>
> In some configurations, for_each_possible_cpu() can do a lot more work
> than for_each_online_cpu(). What are the worst-case userspace-visible
> runtime effects of this additional work?
The impact is limited to CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC kernels. quarantine.o is
built only for CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC, and the quarantine helpers are
compiled as no-ops otherwise, so non-KASAN kernels and tag-based KASAN
builds are not affected by this change.
For CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC kernels, the extra cost is paid only when
removing or shrinking a cache, not on the normal allocation/free fast
path. The added work is one raw-spinlock-protected empty-list check per
possible CPU.