In RT system, after Andrew test, found the following calltrace ,
in KASAN, we record callstack through stack_depot_save(), in this function, may be call alloc_pages, but in RT, the spin_lock replace with
rt_mutex in alloc_pages(), if before call this function, the irq is disabled,
will trigger following calltrace.
maybe add array[KASAN_STACK_DEPTH] in struct kasan_track to record callstack in RT system.
Is there a better solution ?
Thanks
Qiang
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:951
[ 14.522262] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 640, name: mount
[ 14.522304] Call Trace:
[ 14.522306] dump_stack+0x92/0xc1
[ 14.522313] ___might_sleep.cold.99+0x1b0/0x1ef
[ 14.522319] rt_spin_lock+0x3e/0xc0
[ 14.522329] local_lock_acquire+0x52/0x3c0
[ 14.522332] get_page_from_freelist+0x176c/0x3fd0
[ 14.522543] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x28f/0x7f0
[ 14.522559] stack_depot_save+0x3a1/0x470
[ 14.522564] kasan_save_stack+0x2f/0x40
[ 14.523575] kasan_record_aux_stack+0xa3/0xb0
[ 14.523580] insert_work+0x48/0x340
[ 14.523589] __queue_work+0x430/0x1280
[ 14.523595] mod_delayed_work_on+0x98/0xf0
[ 14.523607] kblockd_mod_delayed_work_on+0x17/0x20
[ 14.523611] blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x151/0x2b0
[ 14.523620] blk_mq_sched_insert_request+0x2ad/0x470
[ 14.523633] blk_mq_submit_bio+0xd2a/0x2330
[ 14.523675] submit_bio_noacct+0x8aa/0xfe0
[ 14.523693] submit_bio+0xf0/0x550
[ 14.523714] submit_bio_wait+0xfe/0x200
[ 14.523724] xfs_rw_bdev+0x370/0x480 [xfs]
[ 14.523831] xlog_do_io+0x155/0x320 [xfs]
[ 14.524032] xlog_bread+0x23/0xb0 [xfs]
[ 14.524133] xlog_find_head+0x131/0x8b0 [xfs]
[ 14.524375] xlog_find_tail+0xc8/0x7b0 [xfs]
[ 14.524828] xfs_log_mount+0x379/0x660 [xfs]
[ 14.524927] xfs_mountfs+0xc93/0x1af0 [xfs]
[ 14.525424] xfs_fs_fill_super+0x923/0x17f0 [xfs]
[ 14.525522] get_tree_bdev+0x404/0x680
[ 14.525622] vfs_get_tree+0x89/0x2d0
[ 14.525628] path_mount+0xeb2/0x19d0
[ 14.525648] do_mount+0xcb/0xf0
[ 14.525665] __x64_sys_mount+0x162/0x1b0
[ 14.525670] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
[ 14.525674] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[ 14.525677] RIP: 0033:0x7fd6c15eaade
________________________________________
发件人: Dmitry Vyukov <dvy...@google.com>
发送时间: 2021年4月13日 23:29
收件人: Zhang, Qiang
抄送: Andrew Halaney; andre...@gmail.com; ryabin...@gmail.com; ak...@linux-foundation.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; kasa...@googlegroups.com
主题: Re: Question on KASAN calltrace record in RT
[Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address]
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 10:26 AM Zhang, Qiang <Qiang...@windriver.com> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone
>
> In RT system, after Andrew test, found the following calltrace ,
> in KASAN, we record callstack through stack_depot_save(), in this function, may be call alloc_pages, but in RT, the spin_lock replace with
> rt_mutex in alloc_pages(), if before call this function, the irq is disabled,
> will trigger following calltrace.
>
> maybe add array[KASAN_STACK_DEPTH] in struct kasan_track to record callstack in RT system.
>
> Is there a better solution ?
>Hi Qiang,
>
>Adding 2 full stacks per heap object can increase memory usage too >much.
>The stackdepot has a preallocation mechanism, I would start with
>adding interrupts check here:
>https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.12-rc7/source/lib/stackdepot.c#L294
>and just not do preallocation in interrupt context. This will solve
>the problem, right?
It seems to be useful, however, there are the following situations
If there is a lot of stack information that needs to be saved in interrupts, the memory which has been allocated to hold the stack information is depletion, when need to save stack again in interrupts, there will be no memory available .
Thanks
Qiang
________________________________________
发件人: Mike Galbraith <efa...@gmx.de>
发送时间: 2021年4月14日 12:00
收件人: Dmitry Vyukov; Zhang, Qiang
抄送: Andrew Halaney; andre...@gmail.com; ryabin...@gmail.com; ak...@linux-foundation.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; kasa...@googlegroups.com
主题: Re: Question on KASAN calltrace record in RT
[Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address]
On Tue, 2021-04-13 at 17:29 +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
+ u32 hash, preemptible = !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) || preemptible();
if CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT is enabled and but not in preemptible, the prealloc should be allowed
should be change like this:
may_prealloc = !(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && preemptible());
Thanks
Qiang
________________________________________
发件人: Mike Galbraith <efa...@gmx.de>
发送时间: 2021年4月14日 15:56
收件人: Zhang, Qiang; Dmitry Vyukov
抄送: Andrew Halaney; andre...@gmail.com; ryabin...@gmail.com; ak...@linux-foundation.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; kasa...@googlegroups.com
主题: Re: 回复: Question on KASAN calltrace record in RT
[Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address]
On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 07:29 +0000, Zhang, Qiang wrote:
>
> if CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT is enabled and but not in preemptible, the prealloc should be allowed
>
>No, you can't take an rtmutex when not preemptible.
>
Oh, I'm in a mess,
Thank you for your explanation.
> -Mike