Correct sequence

[jerome keslin]

Playing IMP pairs.

I think 6nt by South or 6s by South should have been the final contract, but how do you think the bidding should have proceeded after the strange 2c overcall? 

[Martin Ambuhl]

On 3/13/2025 1:15 PM, jerome keslin wrote:
> Playing IMP pairs.

>
> image.png
> I think 6nt by South or 6s by South should have been the final contract,
> but how do you think the bidding should have proceeded after the strange
> 2c overcall?

After North opened 1S on S:8 H:AQT754 D:QJ5 C:AT5
and South after (pass):1S:(2C) bid 2H on S:AKQJ54 H:9 D:AKT C:J92,
there is no way to continue "correctly". NS deserve at best whatever
happened to them.

[Carl WEISMAN]

It seems to me that North’s solid spades are the most urgent feature to describe.

On Mar 13, 2025, at 1:15 PM, jerome keslin <jet...@gmail.com> wrote:

Playing IMP pairs.

<image.png>

I think 6nt by South or 6s by South should have been the final contract, but how do you think the bidding should have proceeded after the strange 2c overcall? 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Kaplan-Sheinwold Bidding System" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kaplan-sheinwo...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kaplan-sheinwold/CAOz7kNqkGoo%2BG0b-kbCNFo3UM0RhEYBuKfO%2BJLh6fGz4VghXsg%40mail.gmail.com.

[Christopher Monsour]

The 3D and 4C bids are both inexplicable.  Opener had a clear 3S rebid.  Responder had a clear 3N call over 3D.

The final 4S call is also absurd.  4C should have extras.  Having already made a scientific approach impossible, opener should leap to 6S over 4C.  

Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Get Outlook for Android

---

From: 'Carl WEISMAN' via The Kaplan-Sheinwold Bidding System <kaplan-s...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2025 4:14:47 PM
To: kaplan-s...@googlegroups.com <kaplan-s...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Correct sequence

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kaplan-sheinwold/EDBDA39E-0CA6-4B68-A1D9-EAD28E0FE4B3%40verizon.net.

[jerome keslin]

So kindly suggest a sequence after:
1s - (2c) - 2h - p
?

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kaplan-sheinwold/DM6PR15MB370698E08A743F73C9751A8DD1D32%40DM6PR15MB3706.namprd15.prod.outlook.com.