The ballot candy worked, and Amendment 7 to ban ranked choice voting passed without there being an actual state-wide public debate about the merits of ranking.
We had two ideas of how to counter this:
1) Have Kansas City pass a trigger law that would put ranked voting in place once state law allows it. This would at least communicate that Kansas Citians want it, making future progress more likely.
2) Have a petition drive for a Missouri "Local Options Amendment" that would use the same technique that was successful for Amendment 7: have the ballot language wording be something that anyone would have a knee-jerk vote yes on if they simply read the ballot language and nothing else. Of course, we wouldn't need a deceptive ballot candy approach to do that -- a straightforward, honestly-stated policy - that locales get to decide how they vote - would do it.
Trigger Law
We had a meeting with KC city council member Wes Rogers and he was enthusiastic about it, saying he would bring it up with other council members. We were hoping others would be disgusted with it all -- we know Mayor Lucas said so in his Facebook page -- and so might want to. Alas, it's the opposite. They don't want to rock the boat right now.
We have to wait for the political winds to change on this one. But they will -- after all, they always do -- so we'll keep watching for opportunity.
Local Options Amendment
You might ask why we don't just go for a state constitutional amendment to establish ranked choice voting state-wide. That would get people excited, and it would automatically over-ride Amendment 7 if passed.
But here's what happened around the U.S. last November: every single measure for ranking on a city or local level passed. And every measure on a state-wide level failed. Except for a repeal effort in Alaska, but that was a squeaker.
The problem is that the state-wide ones weren't simple ranked choice voting, but a complicated system being pushed by big money and which includes a jungle primary. That is, a non-partisan primary where all candidates run together without being divided out by party. That's the way we've run our city elections in Kansas City for decades and mainly voters like it, but on the state level, primaries are divided by party. So the idea of a jungle primary got mixed up with ranking and drew opposition because of that.
We could fix that, of course, by having it be simple ranked choice voting for our state without jungle primaries. We keep making the case that the parties would benefit from using ranking in their own primaries.
But when cities are doing so very well and states are doing so very poorly, if we poured in the effort state-wide and lost, we'd do it knowing that that was the recent track record. So, not a good strategy.
On the other hand, having a constitution amendment saying that localities could do it if they wanted, and parties could do it in their own primaries if they wanted, is something that simply gets us back to where we were before Amendment 7 passed. It's strategically sound from a legal point of view and would let us go back to getting ranking built up in the cities so that state-wide becomes more likely later.
But only getting back to where we were before is not likely to excite volunteers as much.
In any event, a state-wide petition drive involves way more resources than Better Ballot KC has. There are a couple of other Missouri groups who support ranking among other election reforms who have the resources and expertise, but they're both working on different election reforms instead. They'll be helpful to us if we can get the ball rolling. But how can we get the ball rolling unless a group with resources and expertise and practice is interested? We don't see that on the horizon just yet.
We will, of course, hop on it if opportunity arises.
Public Education
What we do know is that whenever an opportunity arises that we can grab, it will work better the more educated the public is about ranking.
Therefore, we keep up the effort to leaflet, table, and speak to groups.
Anyone interested in volunteering to leaflet or table, or having an idea of a place that would be good to do so, please hit reply and let us know. And if you can get us invited to speak to a group, the education sticks better when it's discussed at length.