This one smells better than the other article.
My answer, starting a couple of years ago, is to tear down social media. If this was a disease, we'd attack it with every means possible.
It's malignant in the truest sense. It totally blurs any distinction between fact and fiction. In fact it rewards bullshit. The truth is ultimately boring, generating fewer "likes". Fake stuff gets more hits. So people read a lot about a pedophile ring run by Hillary Clinton out of a pizzeria in NYC. It becomes enough of a "fact" that an armed man goes there to end it. Children get harassed, menaced, and shamed. The consequences have been clearly documented.
As long as social media operates based on hits and likes, it will continue to be a negative influence, with or without Russia. Add in Russia and other bad actors with their troll bots and other amplification tools and the whole thing looks like a great way to cause serious damage to our society.
Social media needs huge doses of what G and Dave suggest. G says ignore it altogether. Dave wants NAP and self-regulated better behavior.
Too bad that neither of those work with humans involved. As DF will attest, money drives behavior more strongly than NAP. And money drives ALL of social media.