U.S. Seizure of Shadow Fleet Tanker 'Skipper' Ends Years-Long Sanctions-Evasion Run

[Brian Kegerreis]

U.S. Seizure of Shadow Fleet Tanker 'Skipper' Ends Years-Long Sanctions-Evasion Run https://share.google/52aYgEPxRZGMO79Pq 

US Coast Guard seizes ship used to avoid sanctions and fund terrorists. 

Liberals cry gnashing thier teeth and blaming Trump for everything of course because of TDS

[kan...@aol.com]

No, Brian. And fuck you again. 

Liberals just want something called transparency. You know, like when we killed two survivors of an attack on a boat. 

I note ZERO commentary from you about THAT event. Before you embarrass yourself with some Fox News generated bullshit, recall that the US rescued Japanese and German seamen after their ships were sunk. That was considered a longstanding maritime behavior, even in time of REAL war. I'll stipulate that Japanese and Germans didn't always do the same. 

So we'd love you to justify that killing, something that Trump, Hegseth and their well-trained chimpanzee mouthpieces haven't been able to come up with. 

And if there's been unsanctioned moving of oil all this time, why only NOW is Trump doing something about it? Why not during his first term in office? Any chance he's just "wagging the dog"? You know, creating a distraction from- oh I don't know- the Epstein fiasco? Just spitballing here. Or maybe it's about trying to get the Venezuelan Prez out of office. He's really zeroed in on that task. 

Can we get an explanation of how forced regime change is part of Trump's avowed moved toward  non-intervention? 

Whiny Liberals are dying to know. And here's a Google post about the LONGSTANDING tradition I speak of. Maybe if Hegseth could actually read.................

Military Necessity vs. Humanitarian Law: The rules of war at the time (primarily the 1907 Hague Convention concerning the Laws and Customs of War at Sea and the developing principles that would lead to the 1949 Geneva Conventions) expected the victor to take measures to rescue crews after an engagement, provided it was safe and practical. The prohibition against actively attacking survivors remained absolute, but failing to rescue due to legitimate military necessity was considered legally defensible

[kan...@aol.com]

And I almost forgot: does this help or hinder his goal of getting a Nobel  Peace Prize? 

[kan...@aol.com]

And when you say "blaming Trump for everything", who else should give blame/credit to for the ship seizure?

In this case it's pretty clear that Trump is responsible, good or not. 

That doesn't sound like TDS to me. 

Your responses are sounding more and more like those of Stephen Cheung. He's that fat fuck spokesperson for Trump who ALWAYS says the same thing to anyone who criticizes Trump. He's calls them pea-brained, losers, pieces of shit, with brains rotted  by TDS. It's usually almost always the exact same litany, like he's memorized the lines. 

Are you reading from his playbook? 

[Brian Kegerreis]

I brought up one thing snd one thing only. And it was for once a seemingly good thing that Trump did. And like most people on the left you cant say one good thing about it because Trump did it. That is called TDS. 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Kansas City Diversity Coalition" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kansas-city-diversity...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kansas-city-diversity-coalition/19d15b3b-3866-47c5-995e-a8a023b4db3en%40googlegroups.com.

[kan...@aol.com]

 I don't know if it was good or not. Maybe after a few hearings from a  less biased House we'll get at the truth. If it's such a good thing, why didn't he do it eight years ago? 

Why didn't Biden or Obama do it? Democrats have been known to do good things too. 

But TDS is YOU saying that it was good BECAUSE Trump did it. And the flourish of TDS is everybody  in his cult says the exact same things over and over. Except K. Noem; who stupidly says that this has to do with drugs. Can you explain THAT? 

Also needing explanation is how much oil is shipped around like this. How many countries are involved. And why is this the FIRST and ONLY time we've heard about interdiction? 

See why this is WAY more than TDS? It smacks as a one-off; when the same thing has been occurring for a long time without publicized interruption. 

[kan...@aol.com]

https://www.visualcapitalist.com/global-black-market-fuel-theft/

https://windward.ai/glossary/what-is-oil-smuggling/

Brian, here are a couple of articles on oil smuggling. It's a multi-billion dollar per year enterprise. 

So this "thing" that Trump did was either a drop in the bucket of interdiction or part of something that has been going on for years. Either way it's suspicious the amount of publicity that Trump attached to this. And your not understanding this is part of your TDS Type II. 

It's like publicizing the seizure of 10 kilos of cocaine/heroin at the border and calling it a massive break in the drug trade. 

"We seized a tanker, a really big one. In fact the largest tanker ever". 

Don't you ever tire of his really crazy need to gloat/brag? Isn't condoning all that bravado really the true TDS, as exemplified by his entire cult? Is that fruit a fruit punch stain on your  T-shirt? 

Still wondering about the killing of the two men clinging to boat wreckage. But I'll guess that you'll post some other recent event as a distraction. Like the ONE person caught voting illegally.