Trump says GOD supports war in Iran

[kan...@aol.com]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/04/06/trump-iran-war-christianity/

Holy War. Now where have we heard that before? 

He's a fucking moron. Sorry to be repetitive; but it bears paying attention. 

He changes his mind every day on what the reasons for attacking were and what the goals are. I say Epstein files are the one constant. 

Wag the dog. 

[Brian Kegerreis]

This is resl TDS yet again. If there was anything at all in the Epstien files they would have splashed it all over the media in a desperate attempt to prop up Kamala's failing installment plan.  

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Kansas City Diversity Coalition" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kansas-city-diversity...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kansas-city-diversity-coalition/3b192f6c-e283-42a4-a57b-bc572ac44f45n%40googlegroups.com.

[kan...@aol.com]

And  it's NOT TDS to somehow attach the Epstein saga to Kamala?

How full of shit do you have to be before your wife complains? 

And who's the THEY that supposedly will splash the Epstein files? Bondi has hidden the worst parts in her panties all along. Anybody who has access to the files is a total Trump sycophant. The only person who's  spoken about this with any authority is Michael Wolff; and Stephen Cheung has labeled him as a "steaming pile of shit", afflicted with TDS, having a pea-sized brain, etc. 

Typical of Trumpism; anyone who gets close to telling the truth gets smeared and vilified. 

And BK swallows the crap hook, line and sinker. Worse, he then accuses anyone of pointing out FACTS as having a bad case of TDS. 

Just like Covid, there are different strains of TDS. Type II is clearly more venal and deadly. It's untethered from FACTS and thus way more dangerous. And since it pervades social media, it spreads like the measles. 

[Brian Kegerreis]

The Biden DOJ had full access to the Trump files. If there had been any there there they would have relased it to attack Trump and save Kamala's coronation. 

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kansas-city-diversity-coalition/6b4c2cb4-c0b3-4108-867d-d0e582a6777bn%40googlegroups.com.

[kan...@aol.com]

Gee, Brian, maybe Biden chose to NOT weaponize the DOJ. Did you forget that the DOJ and the AG are NOT supposed to be at the personal disposal of POTUS And do you recall that Biden's AG was Merrick Garland; who was known for a VERY conservative approach to prosecution? It's not actually a surprise to anyone with an IQ higher than today's temperature that Biden DIDN'T weaponize the Epstein files. 

But you hang onto that fiction, along with all the other fictions cobbled together by Trump and his circus. 

And are you still SERIOUS that Trump isn't somehow implicated in the files that HAVEN'T been released without massive redactions. His name is in the files hundreds of times (thousands?), more than anyone else. But somehow it's only Democrats who engaged in bad behavior. And then there's that testimony from a woman describing exactly what Trump did to  her. Another fiction? No there there? And the FBI's interviews suddenly not available. 

It's sad enough that you live with you lips permanently glued to Trump's ass. But when it comes to Epstein and his perfidy, I thought that you'd want EVERY shred of evidence investigated, even if your lip/ass connection gets interrupted. I'll live with anything that points to Clinton or any other Democrat. This should be a non-political issue; but it's clear that Trump/Bondi have been dancing as fast as possible to downplay his involvement. How else to explain their criminal failure to adhere to the recently passed bill calling for TOTAL release of the files? They claim that they're protecting victims; but their redactions have actually exposed some names, while at the same time covering up all kinds of bad behavior by................. who knows? 

   This should be easy. Give the files to the House. Have a committee of Dems/Reps scour them for as long as it take. Let the political chips fall where they may. You should agree without hesitation, and without the whole Biden/Harris bullshit. 

[B Keg]

Ok Karen. 

Be nice, even when you don't want to!

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kansas-city-diversity-coalition/2a842771-d375-4f46-bd05-13039aaac8c7n%40googlegroups.com.

[B Keg]

And you know for the record I have been 100% for releasing the Epstien files and prosecuting every mother fucker on it. To suggest otherwise is... proof of something wrong with you. 

Be nice, even when you don't want to!

[kan...@aol.com]

Then why do you keep whining about Biden/Garland not releasing the files? Maybe they didn't want to use it to influence the vote. 

Maybe it was a coverup for Democrats. Whatever, Garland was notoriously soft on prosecution; and especially when it involved politicians. Whatever the case, that's bird cage lining now. But the CURRENT admin has been clearly hiding and stalling. Bondi is at the epicenter of this coverup. But I'm sure she gets her marching orders from Trump. But if you're so deeply committed to the files getting released why aren't you saying so BEFORE someone points out what's lacking in your posts? Generally it's just crickets from you. 

And now you have another chance to render an opinion. Pam Bondi doesn't think she needs to testify before Congress because she's no longer AG. 

The medical analogy would be if I killed your wife by way of malpractice and claimed innocence based on the fact that I RETIRED. That doesn't absolve me, or Bondi, from being held responsible. Subpoena Bondi; and if she refuses then hold her in contempt. Worked for Bannon. He spent 4 months in jail. It's Bondi's turn now. 

The only thing wrong with me, BK, and probably G (throw in DF for good measure), is that we can READ. 

You've never actually explained your feelings about the Epstein files, and the total lack of cooperation by Bondi and Trump. If you want to go totally logical, you'd be suggesting a massive coverup. Your chance to chime in. Not holding my breath. 

[B Keg]

Didn't want it to influence the vote? 

Thats the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. Democrats not wanting to influence the vote with real damage g information about a political opponent.... thanks for the deep insight into your deranged out of touch with reality TDS mind. 

The democrats didn't release the Epstien files because it might hurt an existential threat to democracies chances from winning the presidential race. Thats the hill you want to plant your flag on? 

For the record expoae them all and send them all to jail. One more time which has been my refrain when it comes to Trump and Clinton and Obama and Biden and everypne else in DC since 2015... but you can read so you know that. 

Be nice, even when you don't want to!

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kansas-city-diversity-coalition/0646b0cd-cbec-48ae-9a06-ddc364468dc1n%40googlegroups.com.

[kan...@aol.com]

Fuck you; at least learn what a term means before trying to impress us with you Gen Y (X,Z whatever) bona fides. 

Just make a simple statement that you want the E. Files  opened. 

Make another statement that TRUMP/BONDI are doing a coverup

Make another statement............no don't. Biden/Garland has nothing to do with this 

[kan...@aol.com]

When your done trying to  operate  off meds, give us YOUR reason that the Epstein files weren't released. 

I speculated on a few notions that came to mind. Wasn't trying to sell them as gospel. 

Frankly I think it was Garland's choice alone as to what to do. In a REAL admin, the Ag doesn't solicit advice from POTUS. That's the purview of Nixon/Trump. The thing your ignore is that Trump promised to weaponize the DOJ- "retribution". How do think he was going to go about THAT? Simple; get the DOJ to prosecute his chosen targets. And he named names, out loud, and Bondi jumped through hoops for him. But moral people saw through the bullshit and failed to indict several times. And you KNOW how easy it is to get an indictment from a grand jury. Sane people would conclude that the cases were beyond shoddy. No other explanation available. 

[kan...@aol.com]

https://thehill.com/opinion/criminal-justice/5740973-why-biden-didnt-release-the-epstein-files-but-maybe-should-have/

And here Brian is a direct answer to your question. The Hill is pretty middle of the road in regards to bias.

If you need sock  puppets, I can give you the abbreviated version: I was RIGHT. 

Garland worked hard to stay independent from Biden's influence. And he purposely avoided injecting controversy into a political situation. And also there were open cases that demanded that info be kept out of the public. 

And there's the hill (Hill) where I plant my flag. 

Too bad it's a narrative that will perplex you no end. Moral people acting morally, even if it hurt them politically. Go figure, huh. 

[B Keg]

Sure and if you belive that I got some Ocean front property in Idaho to sell you.

Be nice, even when you don't want to!

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kansas-city-diversity-coalition/67efeed1-1c29-48e4-94e5-9b14a531c0efn%40googlegroups.com.

[kan...@aol.com]

So here we are, expected to believe YOU, when a pretty unbiased source explains things very clearly. 

And we're supposed to think that you don't labor under the powerful influence of TDS Type II. 

I'm not buying the property in Idaho; and I'm not buying your bullshit either. 

But if you want to provide us with some SHRED of documentation that offers a different narrative, feel free. But make sure that you forward a source with some decent reputation. 

What's sad is that you don't/can't accept that ethical people actually behave ethically; and that somehow Trump/Bondi is a good role model for how POTUS/DOJ is supposed to function. What it is though, is a criminal enterprise. POTUS uses DOJ to harass and attempt to prosecute people that HE designates as his enemies. And you labor under the delusion that every POTUS/DOJ does this. And if some  POTUS/DOJ actually does act ethically, then in your world they're just suckers. 

Sad for many reasons, the main one being that the whole situation has been poisoned with that thinking. It will take a serious readjustment in people's expectations to right the ship. And you aren't part of the solution. And sadly, I think that you are an avatar for many other like-minded folks. 

[B Keg]

You spent years pounding the Russian Collusion hoax and you still won't even admit it was a hoax. You only accept sources who agree with youband are only skeptical of sources that don't..

You are an excellent useful idiot for the puppet masters. 

Be nice, even when you don't want to!

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kansas-city-diversity-coalition/11cfd51e-d09e-4237-a9fb-10fe20eda18an%40googlegroups.com.

[kan...@aol.com]

Well that was another waste of pixels. 

The Russian involvement in the 2016 election has nothing to do with what we're discussing. 

I just posted an article from a pretty reliable source explaining the Biden/Epstein business. YOU are the one who only believes YOUR sources. You clearly don't like this source. So instead  of being a panty-wadded whining snowflake, just send us an article that says something else. I'll read it and respond. But as of now we have a very legitimate article saying one thing, and YOU saying another. So you without a source of confirmation is as useful as refrigerator in an igloo. Send us an article. Otherwise just accept that you're a whiny snowflake who got a reliable source that DISAGREES with you. Your response is taken directly out of Trump's playbook. If someone says something he doesn't like or asks a question he doesn't like, he just attacks the other person. He never acknowledges the other person or what was said/asked. Just kill the messenger. Well, I've delivered a message; but just pretend it came for your wife, or DF. Then find a reliable rebuttal. And quit wasting  pixels. 

[kan...@aol.com]

And FYI, The Hill is rated almost dead center on the bias scale. That doesn't mean that they're Gospel; but it does mean that they are WAY better than you. 

Waiting for an article. 

[B Keg]

Karen uses an appeal to authority ignoring and cries when it won't be accepted at face value despite the fact that she has a history of passing along false information based on appeals to authority. Then Karen engages in name calling.

Ken does the same thing. 

Be nice, even when you don't want to!

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kansas-city-diversity-coalition/f3f20122-2151-40f7-8031-a4e1ec50d2d1n%40googlegroups.com.

[kan...@aol.com]

You really are fucking stupid. You have ZERO idea what the Karen label means. Don't try to play GenX when you haven't a fucking clue.

So you don't like posts that have some element of authority. You'd rather wing it on your own. That's why G and I (and DF often) think you're full of shit. You pull stuff out of  your ass and try to pass it off as legit. But it still smells like ass

You have yet to post anything to rebut what was proposed about Biden/Garland/DOJ. All you have to do is state an opinion (of your own), then back it up with at least SOMEONE who supports your notions. In the meantime what has transpired is this:

I made a speculation about Biden/Garland/Epstein. You called bullshit, based on your own divination. I gave you an article from a VERY non-biased source. You called more bullshit. You were asked to support your opinion. Crickets on the topic, followed by TDS-ing, Karen-ing, followed by saying that I name call. Projection for certain. 

So quit wasting our time and our pixels. Tell us why you think that Biden/Garland didn't release the Epstein files. That is after all what was being discussed before you tripped and fell into your own rabbit hole. 

[B Keg]

Anyone with 2 functioning neurons knows that they didnt release the files because they didnt have anything on Trump. 

Be nice, even when you don't want to!

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kansas-city-diversity-coalition/0c1af8b3-27e7-46e4-b40c-c35c366e99b7n%40googlegroups.com.

[kan...@aol.com]

I've got three functioning neurons. Two say that you STILL haven't shown us anyone else's notions on this. Again it smells like ass. 

The other neuron waits patiently for you to show us the SMALLEST bit of substantiation. 

Those of us with MORE than two neurons, and a liberal bent, found Garland to not be up to the task. Just for this kind of issue. 

And while we're discussing neurons, the Mueller report DID allude clearly to Russian collusion. I actually have a copy of it if you learn to read. He just did the ethical thing and didn't try to nail Trump with it. 

Ethical; a term that you might want to familiarize yourself with. It's been pretty much erased with Trump and his sycophants. 

I'm truly saddened the knots one has to tie oneself into to justify Trump and his clown car Additionally the lengths one has to go to find non-reasons for why Biden and his crew did/didn't what they did or didn't. It boils down to the simple matter of right/wrong, ethical/venal.  

[B Keg]

For the millionth time im not justifying Trump throw his as in jail for all I care juat throw all the other grifters in with him like the Clinton's Obama's and Biden's.

Be nice, even when you don't want to!

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kansas-city-diversity-coalition/4b8ef03f-1a52-4e22-a5c6-8ad080a91b0dn%40googlegroups.com.

[kan...@aol.com]

Oops, where did the goal posts go? Moved them again, did you? 

Not talking about Trump's grifting. We're talking about the Epstein files and their release/cover-up

I'll bet G LOVES it when you do the Clinton/Obama/Biden thing. That's the lazy, low knowledge person's way of trying to justify Trump's actions. But that's like  comparing a bank robber armed with an AR to a 6 year old who pilfers a pack of gum. The comparison just isn't there. 

Stick to the topic, which is Trump and Epstein and the disposition of the files. 

I'm pretty sure that Obama and Biden weren't involved in this issue. 

But if you insist on discussing grifting, how much money did Obama get while in office? Clinton? Trump has been enriched by several billion, according to best sources. Again, no comparison.

But just stick to Trump. The others have had their "day in court". They've been litigated by the legal system and the court of public opinion. It's now Trump's turn.