acoustic simulations in Julia

503 views
Skip to first unread message

Niccolo' Antonello

unread,
Mar 16, 2015, 10:44:52 AM3/16/15
to julia...@googlegroups.com
Dear julia fellow users,

I wanted to tell you that I just released some Julia code for acoustic simulations:
https://github.com/nantonel/JuFdtd
- a finite difference time domain simulator for room acoustics
https://github.com/nantonel/JuRIM
- a image source method room acoustic impulse response generator
there is lot of space for improvement from the computational point (in particular for the FDTD which is currently not parallelized)
so feel free to join their development!

Niccolò

Stefan Karpinski

unread,
Mar 16, 2015, 12:46:44 PM3/16/15
to Julia Users
Very cool. The may be more discoverable on GitHub if they follow the standard naming convention for Julia repos – i.e. ending in ".jl" instead of having a "Ju" prefix.
Message has been deleted

Niccolo' Antonello

unread,
Apr 15, 2015, 6:55:20 AM4/15/15
to julia...@googlegroups.com
I uploaded this to:
https://github.com/nantonel/RIM.jl
and:
https://github.com/nantonel/Fdtd.jl
thanks for pointing that out!
Niccolo'

Steven G. Johnson

unread,
Apr 15, 2015, 8:59:17 PM4/15/15
to julia...@googlegroups.com


On Wednesday, April 15, 2015 at 6:55:20 AM UTC-4, Niccolo' Antonello wrote:

Note that "FDTD" is a bit too generic ... the term could apply to any time-dependent PDE, and is commonly used for Maxwell's equations.   I would suggest something more specific, like ScalarWaveFDTD

(Wouldn't FDFD, i.e. the frequency-domain scalar Helmholtz equation, be more appropriate for this sort of problem?  Depends on how wide a bandwidth you care about and what you want to simulate, I guess.)

Niccolo' Antonello

unread,
Apr 16, 2015, 6:02:42 AM4/16/15
to julia...@googlegroups.com
Hi Seven,

yes you are right it's too generic! I will change it to AcFdtd.jl since this stuff was done for room acoustics simulation!

https://github.com/nantonel/AcFdtd.jl

Thanks for pointing that out!

Niccolo'

(ps yes frequency domain is not best suited for auralization might be an application for this)
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages