julia-dev

1–8 of 3168

Julia — a fresh approach to numerical computing

This mailing list is in read-only mode and has been moved to https://discourse.julialang.org/c/dev.

0 selected

Michael Francis, … Simon Byrne17

2/6/15

Propose a modification to the parser to support @ as a 'infix' operator for macros

Is that so much nicer than big"1.23"? One reason I liked it as a postfix is that is kind of

unread,

Propose a modification to the parser to support @ as a 'infix' operator for macros

Is that so much nicer than big"1.23"? One reason I liked it as a postfix is that is kind of

2/6/15

David van Leeuwen, Avik Sengupta2

12/14/14

Type parameterized by a parameterized type

Yeah, that's not possible yet. See https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/3766 for a

unread,

Type parameterized by a parameterized type

Yeah, that's not possible yet. See https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/3766 for a

12/14/14

Adam Strzelecki, … ele...@gmail.com6

8/22/14

RFE: Falling back to method based resolution on missing field

> Check out https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/1974 Thanks, I'll continue there. --Adam

unread,

RFE: Falling back to method based resolution on missing field

> Check out https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/1974 Thanks, I'll continue there. --Adam

8/22/14

Tomek Trzeciak, … James Porter19

8/1/14

alternative do-block syntax proposal

bumping my old PR for @as from an earlier round of this discussion :) https://github.com/JuliaLang/

unread,

alternative do-block syntax proposal

bumping my old PR for @as from an earlier round of this discussion :) https://github.com/JuliaLang/

8/1/14

Tuur Benoit, Stefan Karpinski2

6/8/14

immutable types & variables by default

We debated making immutable composites the default, but ultimately decided that it would be

unread,

immutable types & variables by default

We debated making immutable composites the default, but ultimately decided that it would be

6/8/14

Patrick O'Leary, … Jeffrey Sarnoff13

10/12/12

Monads in Julia (and module problems)

makes sense moving on, is there any way to do this (or to obtain a similar outcome)? abstract AbsType

unread,

Monads in Julia (and module problems)

makes sense moving on, is there any way to do this (or to obtain a similar outcome)? abstract AbsType

10/12/12

david tweed, … Stefan Karpinski6

8/2/12

semi-OT: is indentation based scoping off-putting

On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 5:10 PM, John Cowan <johnw...@gmail.com> wrote: > (I wish that

unread,

semi-OT: is indentation based scoping off-putting

On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 5:10 PM, John Cowan <johnw...@gmail.com> wrote: > (I wish that

8/2/12

Ian Watson, Jeff Bezanson3

5/25/12

Syntax question: initializing nested types in a constructor

Perfect! Does precisely what I wanted. Not sure I could have figured that out, but the solution

unread,

Syntax question: initializing nested types in a constructor

Perfect! Does precisely what I wanted. Not sure I could have figured that out, but the solution

5/25/12

Search

Clear search

Close search

Google apps

Main menu