Re: [julia] Improve close methods for SingleAsyncWork (67ed8d1)

Viral B. Shah

unread,

Mar 24, 2015, 4:40:10 AM3/24/15

to JuliaLang/julia, Julia Backports

I believe this is backported, and may justify a prompt 0.3.7 release. Cc: @juliabackports @tkelman

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

Tony Kelman

unread,

Mar 24, 2015, 4:47:46 AM3/24/15

to JuliaLang/julia, Julia Backports

I just tagged 0.3.7 a few hours ago. We haven't posted the binaries yet, but the git history is there.

Elliot Saba

unread,

Mar 24, 2015, 5:20:43 AM3/24/15

to JuliaLang/julia, Julia Backports

0.3.7 hasn't been officially released yet. Is this critical enough for us to retag, rebuild binaries and then release?

Tony Kelman

unread,

Mar 24, 2015, 5:29:20 AM3/24/15

to JuliaLang/julia, Julia Backports

Cross-referencing JuliaLang/ZMQ.jl#76 - I don't like deleting a tag that's been public in the history for ~12 hours, I'd rather just supersede it with a new one and go straight to 0.3.8. A very short march, potentially.

Tony Kelman

unread,

Mar 25, 2015, 5:03:21 AM3/25/15

to JuliaLang/julia, Julia Backports

I believe this is backported

No not yet. @Keno should it be?

Tony Kelman

unread,

Apr 5, 2015, 7:45:04 PM4/5/15

to JuliaLang/julia, Julia Backports

Bump. Again, I don't want to backport this until I get confirmation that it should be backported.

Keno Fischer

unread,

Apr 5, 2015, 8:01:38 PM4/5/15

to JuliaLang/julia, Julia Backports

I don't think that's necessary, and since packages will probably want to support older 0.3 versions too, it would complicate the version checking.

Tony Kelman

unread,

Apr 5, 2015, 8:03:17 PM4/5/15

to JuliaLang/julia, Julia Backports

okay great, thanks Keno

Reply all

Reply to author

Forward