— Ce qui signifie que nous employons communément le télautographe, un appareil perfectionné qui transporte l’écriture comme le téléphone transporte la parole, sans oublier le kinétographe qui enregistre les mouvements, étant pour l’œil ce que le phonographe est pour l’oreille, et le téléphote qui reproduit les images. Ce télautographe donne une garantie plus sérieuse que la simple dépêche dont le premier venu est libre d’abuser. Nous pouvons signer électriquement des mandats ou des traites…
— Même des actes de mariage ?… réplique Pinchinat d’un ton ironique.
— Sans doute, monsieur l’alto. Pourquoi ne se marierait-on pas par fil télégraphique…
— Et divorcer ?…
— Et divorcer !… C’est même ce qui use le plus nos appareils ! »
Là-dessus, bruyant éclat de rire du cicerone, qui fait trembloter toute la bibeloterie de son gilet.
« Vous êtes gai, monsieur Munbar, dit Pinchinat, en partageant l’hilarité de l’Américain.
— Oui… comme une envolée de pinsons un jour de soleil ! »
Hi
there is only one of those many questions I feel I can comment on. I have been researching the nature of Verne’s “ability” to predict some fantastic futuristic engineering. I believe it is rooted in Verne’s deep dive into the Victorian science of his time. Like Leonardo da Vinci, Verne's ideas seem to resist death. It is not in the engineering details but in Verne’s concepts and ideas that have longevity. This immortality is related to Verne’s use and study of evolving scientific principles. Victorian scientific principles such as electromagnetism, photoelectric effects, and thermodynamics are still cornerstones today. Except for quantum theory, Victorian science's basics and principles are foundational to science's advance. In particular, the electrical principles of Faraday and others were followed closely by Verne. Faraday often included futuristic applications in his writings.
In his book Physics of the Future (2011), theoretical physicist Michio Kuku notes that Verne’s research, study, and collaboration allowed him to be in a future that was already present. There are examples where you stand in awe of the depth of Verne’s scientific knowledge. Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea (1870) and Mysterious Island (1874) are best described as chemical romances. Verne moves between the romance of chemistry and a textbook of Victorian chemistry.
The extent of Jules Verne’s knowledge and understanding of Victorian science is the key to Verne’s futurism. Verne refused to be called a scientist. However, many of his novels betray him; for most readers, the combination of storytelling and science attracted them. Verne anchors his works on science and exploration with the study and review. This scientific foundation allows Verne’s visions to be reborn even today in such things as sea illumination, compressed air storage of energy, air batteries, liquid air engines, carbon dioxide engines, space cannons, pneumatic air trains, hydrogen-fueled vehicles, circular cities, floating cities, economic hydrogen production through electrolysis, wind power and tractor rays. Verne’s used the theories of scientists such as Humphrey Davy, François Arago, Micheal Faraday, James Maxwell, Heinrich Hertz, Charles Sainte-Claire Deville, Elie de Beaumont, Louis Figuier, and adventurers such as Jacques Arago, Alexander von Humboldt, Jean Chaffanjon, and Camille Flammarion. Part of Verne’s perpetuity is directly related to the perpetuity of Victorian scientific theories, which were foundational to engineering and even the current quantum state of physics today.
Another area of research is Verne’s understanding of exponential growth.Verne’s hybridized design augured the 1960s space race and arms race design methods. Verne anticipates that applying new scientific principles could be amalgamated to achieve the engineering needed for the project. He saw technology as exponential growth. When the project team feels overwhelmed by the engineering advances needed, chief engineer Barbicane enforces their faith, “if we put our minds to it and take advantage of scientific progress, we should be to make cannonballs ten times heavier.” Verne had a true sense of exponential growth. Verne’s ability to foresee the exponential growth of technology overcomes his natural human bias to think linearly. Exponential thinking allows Verne to design into the future based on the past. Verne never mentions technology's “exponential” growth in his writings but demonstrates it using history and statistics.
I have 4 published articles and two in-process I would be happy to share
Quent
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jules-verne-forum/1353860624.2519752.1734001698223%40mail.yahoo.com.

Michio Kaku’s asks ‘how does Verne do it?
These are my thoughts in trying to answer that question
Firstly, I think that, although undoubtedly a genius (I think the Leonardo da Vinci comparison is very apt) and I agree with Verne looking exponentially at scientific development. I do believe however that Jules Verne may have had a far greater number of scientific advisors (especially American and British), for a longer time period than previously thought. Possible suspects would be the Transatlantic cable entrepreneur Cyrus Field, Oceanographer Mathew Fontaine Maury, shipbuilder John Laird, Paleontologist Sir Richard Owen (inventor of the word dinosaur) and Lord Kelvin….these people .....or others of similar status.
Secondly, I think Verne may have had a greater number of educational, and even royal sponsors over a longer time than previously thought to help Verne network in his ideas. My first example is the Paris based newspaper magnate Gordon Bennett Jr. Bennett gets so much ‘product placement’ for the New York Herald in 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea and then ‘plays’ the part of reporter Gideon Spillett of the New York Herald in the sequel The Mysterious Island. If Bennett did not pay Verne, then he should have done. Bennett of course did sponsor Jules Verne’s In the Year 2889 (1889). He was also an eccentric lunatic whose 'wild animal hoax' in Central Park seems to be played out in Propellor Island (1895).
Another patron who may have been more involved is Napoleon III who paid for the Great Eastern to be refurbished for the 1867 Paris Exposition and sent Jules Verne to America to help publicise the event. Verne also, received the Legion d’honneur from Napoleon III. Verne seems to be a ‘goodwill ambassador’ linking Britain, France and America (despite what he says about the British Empire in Mysterious Island).
Thirdly Verne’s love of America and America’s love for Jules Verne. There seems to be a conscious effort on the behalf of the American Government to carry out the wishes of Jules Verne, whether it is to build the world’s first submarine called Nautilus and sail it under an ice cap, or a spaceship called Colombia and send it to the Moon and get Neil Armstrong to give a speech praising Jules Verne the day before the Apollo 11 astronauts splash down in the Pacific Ocean. A catalyst to scientific advancement – most definitely and on one or two occasions perhaps consciously .
Fourthly despite professing his love for America, Verne said he knew little of the English language, …I believe it would be ‘too inefficient’ for someone who is ‘networking’ almost as a communal writing organism to not speak English. But if so, why hide it? why deceive about it?
These are just my thoughts.
John



To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jules-verne-forum/9d8c8404-b910-49d5-b609-2ed8ecc3df38n%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jules-verne-forum/CAGvpz0-FYHihvvh9JAYjaFBywA33ion6OwgKeStgvi_rfGzmJg%40mail.gmail.com.