@Mark
I believe I may have found the beginning of an explanation for bug # 1
You said the words "cue creepy, haunted-mansion noises" about this
bug,.... well you are right to the point, its even worst that creepy,
truly crazy haunty:
It seems that bug # 1 only occur when I'm HOME !!!!
You remember when I said yesterday I tested JD 1.84 and I didn't have
the bug, and this morning I had the bug with JD 1.85 and when I step
back to 1.84 I had the bug again this time with 1.84 !!!! Well
yesterday I only did the test while I was in the office. This morning,
when I had the bug I was home.
This afternoon I re-did the test in various ways with 1.84 and 1.85
while I was in the tube and walking in the street far from home and I
did not have the bug (with neither 1.85 or 1.84).
Now I'm back Home, and I have the bug again.
Also, remember last week when I started to complain about this bug
(see discussion about JD 1.82), this was driving me crazy, and at some
point I was mentioning that the bug was occurring at RANDOM. Well last
week I was not home but on vacation at my parents' home where there is
wifi connection. And I kept testing JD in and out of their house... In
their house my phone was connected to their wifi network, at the beach
I had no wifi connection ;-) hence the reason for the "random"
occurrence of the bug.
My conclusion is that the bug occur only when I'm connected to wifi,
in other word when there is a "choice" of functioning wifi or data
connection for the phone.
This is giving me new ideas to try to understand this bug and do more
test.
As a side note, I want to flag that this afternoon, during my testing
session of 1.85 and 1.84, I tried to install 1.85 after uninstalling
1.84 and JD would keep FC has soon as I would hit the Activate button
in the setting page. The only way around this issue was to uninstall
both JD AND AOSP helper before installing the new version of JD. After
this very fresh install, everything went fine...
Lastly, you say "If my special ROM doesn't like JD"... But my ROM is
not that special! Modaco's Rom by Paul are very popular, as close as
possible to stock roms and usually very stable... (and, from what I
read, JD also seem pretty popular among people discussing on my
"special" Rom's thread ;) so I hope getting rid of this bug will not
only serve me...
On 21 juil, 15:25, Mark Lowne <
marklo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Agh! Now I want to remove the AOSP helper again :(
> Well, I'll remove the various warnings at least. Nothing to worry
> about: the AOSP helper is used to toggle between 3g and 2g only. It
> *only* works on CyanogenMod and Surfinette's ROM apparently, but since
> there's no way (that I know of) of knowing beforehand if that's the
> case, Setup will try to install it on all rooted phones - once it
> confirms it doesn't work, it'll uninstall it immediately.
>
> @Surfinette: ok, you can see for yourself if the
> red-dot-but-data-enabled is a bug in JD's logic: just check the log
> (either will do) after it happens and see what's the latest (most
> recent) entry about data. If there's a 'Data enabled', then some
> trigger is re-enabling data but JD fails to update the notification
> accordingly. If, on the other hand, there's just 'Data disabled', then
> *something else* (cue creepy, haunted-mansion noises) is re-enabling
> data.
> I'm now convinced that it must be the latter: try to remember if this
> problem was introduced with some JD build (1.8.2 or something), or if
> it really was your updating to Froyo, as I think it is (you can always
> double-check by installing some old version, say 1.7.9, on your Froyo
> ROM). If so, then your special ROM doesn't like JD (unless you have
> some other weird apps that could be causing this, but that seems
> unlikely).
>
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Surfinette
>