You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to jtabl...@googlegroups.com
Although I said the bug in paintchat was fixed, I guess it would have helped if I 'used' paintchat insead of just activating the pressure sensitivity. I havent been able to investigate why this happens in the current deployed paintchat (cause i have fucked with the code for months before deploying something new). But here is a visual example of the same app using JTablet2 drivers calling the Jtablet0.9x API and the new version.
I can tell you how some of the calls are being made, but essentially the bottom line, just swapping out jtablet 0.9x installation for the 'backwards compatable' jtablet2 is not achieving the same results.
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to jtabl...@googlegroups.com
Thanks for the screenshots, that helps a lot! I'll see if I can track it down for the 1.2.5 release.
Marcello
Marcello Bastéa-Forte
unread,
May 30, 2010, 12:19:18 AM5/30/10
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to jtabl...@googlegroups.com
Hey Garret,
I finally found the cause of the problem you're seeing.
It appears to be due to a misunderstanding in the JTablet 0.9.x API spec by PaintChat/Shi-Painter. Specifically, the poll() method returns false when there is no new data, but PaintChat seems to be interpreting it as no pressure.
I'll commit a workaround shortly and it should be included in the 1.2.5 release.