Re: Timeline for developing RI and TCK?

Manik Surtani

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 11:10:05 AM1/30/13

to Jim Bethancourt, jsr...@googlegroups.com

This is actually a question for the group - adding them.

Ideally I'd like to be able to have the spec complete by the end of June, and the RI/TCK complete by the end of September, in time for JavaOne. But that would depend on how much time people have to commit to it.

Comments?

Cheers

Manik

On 30 January 2013 16:05, Jim Bethancourt <jimbeth...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Manik,
What is the proposed timeline for developing the RI and TCK? I think knowing these will help folks who might be interested know what the duration of commitment will be.

Thanks,

Jim

Jim Bethancourt

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 11:21:58 AM1/30/13

to jsr...@googlegroups.com

Thanks for propagating my question to the group - we have a Houston JUG meeting tomorrow evening and I'd like to share dates with them to elicit participation.

Thanks,

Jim

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JSR 347 discussions" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jsr347+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Rich Midwinter

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 11:23:23 AM1/30/13

to jsr...@googlegroups.com

It probably depends on the features included too. It certainly sounds a reasonable target to aim for to me though, given just what's currently proposed on the wiki. I can certainly flex a fair amount of time in as and when you can use it.

Rich.

Joseph Ottinger

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 11:25:24 AM1/30/13

to jsr...@googlegroups.com

And mercury certainly serves as a basis for experimentation. The idea was to name things after planets (thus the "other API" I was going to try was going to be called "venus.") But Mercury actually works, within its scope, and can easily be expanded.