json-ld

One of the things that has come out of the RDF Working Group work at the W3C was the understanding

On 01/27/11 11:28, Ian Davis wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:07 AM, Manu Sporny <msporny@

On 11/28/2010 08:48 AM, Niklas Lindström wrote: > First off, thanks for JSON-LD, it is an

Hi folks, Did a quick rev of the JSON-LD specification tonight to bring it up to speed with some

On 11/20/2010 05:28 PM, Bradley Allen wrote: > Manu- So, given what you've said here, the

After playing around for a few moments using a JSON-LD dump of the linked data in http://t4gm.info I

Just wanted to pass on some good news. JSON-LD will be influencing the direction of the JSON syntax

On 11/08/10 15:23, Mark Birbeck wrote: > I understand the motivation, but a very big "-1

Apologies, but I screwed up the example at the end of the original post; the N-Triples should be:

Hi Mark, Am Mittwoch, den 27.10.2010, 11:16 +0100 schrieb Mark Birbeck: > Anywhere that you can

On 10/26/2010 10:11 PM, SaraSTories wrote: > Dum ukrainian president testing to smoke weed video I

Hi Mark, thank you for this detailed explanation. I understand now the point of JSON-LD and why there

Just pushed out a new draft of the JSON-LD spec. Richard, I haven't responded to your previous e-

Mark, I'm glad that we're on the same page with regard to type coercion. Please help me

Thanks for the detailed response Mark. Some comments inline. On 16 Oct 2010, at 13:23, Mark Birbeck

Interesting discussion! I agree that everything should go into the context. Have you considered

Manu and Mark- Thanks for the quick feedback. Per Manu's suggestions, I will work on getting

Hi Manu, Yes, we could say that token and CURIE processing apply to the object part of a triple, but

On 10/15/10 11:45, Ian Davis wrote: > Nice to see more work on JSON serialisations for RDF. I have